Amplifying circuit lower bounds against polynomial time, with applications

被引:10
作者
Lipton, Richard J. [1 ]
Williams, Ryan [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Coll Comp, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Circuit evaluation; quantified Boolean formulas; lower bounds; NC; size-depth trade-offs; SPACE TRADEOFFS; SIZE; DEPTH;
D O I
10.1007/s00037-013-0069-5
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
We give a self-reduction for the Circuit Evaluation problem (CircEval) and prove the following consequences. Amplifying size-depth lower bounds. If CircEval has Boolean circuits of n(k) size and n(1-delta) depth for some k and delta, then for every epsilon > 0, there is a delta' > 0 such that CircEval has circuits of n(1+epsilon) size and n(1-delta') depth. Moreover, the resulting circuits require only (O) over tilde (n(epsilon)) bits of non-uniformity to construct. As a consequence, strong enough depth lower bounds for Circuit Evaluation imply a full separation of P and NC (even with a weak size lower bound). Lower bounds for quantified Boolean formulas. Let c, d > 1 and e < 1 satisfy c < (1 - e + d)/d. Either the problem of recognizing valid quantified Boolean formulas (QBF) is not solvable in TIME[n(c)], or the Circuit Evaluation problem cannot be solved with circuits of n(d) size and n(e) depth. This implies unconditional polynomial-time uniform circuit lower bounds for solving QBF. We also prove that QBF does not have n(c)-time uniform NC circuits, for all c < 2.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 343
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   OPTIMAL LOWER BOUNDS ON THE DEPTH OF POLYNOMIAL-SIZE THRESHOLD CIRCUITS FOR SOME ARITHMETIC FUNCTIONS [J].
WEGENER, I .
INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 1993, 46 (02) :85-87
[42]   Limits on Alternation Trading Proofs for Time–Space Lower Bounds [J].
Samuel R. Buss ;
Ryan Williams .
computational complexity, 2015, 24 :533-600
[43]   Almost-Everywhere Circuit Lower Bounds from Non-Trivial Derandomization [J].
Chen, Lijie ;
Lyu, Xin ;
Williams, R. Ryan .
2020 IEEE 61ST ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (FOCS 2020), 2020, :1-12
[44]   Lower bounds for invariant statistical models with applications to principal component analysis [J].
Wahl, Martin .
ANNALES DE L INSTITUT HENRI POINCARE-PROBABILITES ET STATISTIQUES, 2022, 58 (03) :1565-1589
[45]   Inductive Time-Space Lower Bounds for Sat and Related Problems [J].
Ryan Williams .
computational complexity, 2006, 15 :433-470
[46]   LIMITS ON ALTERNATION TRADING PROOFS FOR TIME-SPACE LOWER BOUNDS [J].
Buss, Samuel R. ;
Williams, Ryan .
COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY, 2015, 24 (03) :533-600
[47]   Inductive time-space lower bounds for SAT and related problems [J].
Williams, Ryan .
COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY, 2006, 15 (04) :433-470
[48]   Comparison-Based Time-Space Lower Bounds for Selection [J].
Chan, Timothy M. .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON ALGORITHMS, 2010, 6 (02)
[49]   Time-Space Lower Bounds for Two-Pass Learning [J].
Garg, Sumegha ;
Raz, Ran ;
Tal, Avishay .
34TH COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY CONFERENCE (CCC 2019), 2019, 137
[50]   Circuit Lower Bounds for Nondeterministic Quasi-Polytime: An Easy Witness Lemma for NP and NQP [J].
Murray, Cody ;
Williams, Ryan .
STOC'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 50TH ANNUAL ACM SIGACT SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF COMPUTING, 2018, :890-901