Amplifying circuit lower bounds against polynomial time, with applications

被引:10
作者
Lipton, Richard J. [1 ]
Williams, Ryan [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Coll Comp, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Circuit evaluation; quantified Boolean formulas; lower bounds; NC; size-depth trade-offs; SPACE TRADEOFFS; SIZE; DEPTH;
D O I
10.1007/s00037-013-0069-5
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
We give a self-reduction for the Circuit Evaluation problem (CircEval) and prove the following consequences. Amplifying size-depth lower bounds. If CircEval has Boolean circuits of n(k) size and n(1-delta) depth for some k and delta, then for every epsilon > 0, there is a delta' > 0 such that CircEval has circuits of n(1+epsilon) size and n(1-delta') depth. Moreover, the resulting circuits require only (O) over tilde (n(epsilon)) bits of non-uniformity to construct. As a consequence, strong enough depth lower bounds for Circuit Evaluation imply a full separation of P and NC (even with a weak size lower bound). Lower bounds for quantified Boolean formulas. Let c, d > 1 and e < 1 satisfy c < (1 - e + d)/d. Either the problem of recognizing valid quantified Boolean formulas (QBF) is not solvable in TIME[n(c)], or the Circuit Evaluation problem cannot be solved with circuits of n(d) size and n(e) depth. This implies unconditional polynomial-time uniform circuit lower bounds for solving QBF. We also prove that QBF does not have n(c)-time uniform NC circuits, for all c < 2.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 343
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Communication complexity towards lower bounds on circuit depth [J].
Edmonds, J ;
Impagliazzo, R ;
Rudich, S ;
Sgall, J .
COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY, 2001, 10 (03) :210-246
[22]   Superpolynomial Lower Bounds Against Low-Depth Algebraic Circuits [J].
Limaye, Nutan ;
Srinivasan, Srikanth ;
Tavenas, Sebastien .
2021 IEEE 62ND ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (FOCS 2021), 2022, :804-814
[23]   Interval selection: Applications, algorithms, and lower bounds [J].
Erlebach, T ;
Spieksma, FCR .
JOURNAL OF ALGORITHMS, 2003, 46 (01) :27-53
[24]   Proof Complexity Lower Bounds from Algebraic Circuit Complexity [J].
Forbes, Michael A. ;
Shpilka, Amir ;
Tzameret, Iddo ;
Wigderson, Avi .
THEORY OF COMPUTING, 2021, 17 (17)
[25]   Circuit lower bounds from learning-theoretic approaches [J].
Kawachi, Akinori .
THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2018, 733 :83-98
[26]   Time and space lower bounds for nonblocking implementations [J].
Jayanti, P ;
Tan, K ;
Toueg, S .
SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2000, 30 (02) :438-456
[27]   ON LOWER BOUNDS OF TIME COMPLEXITY OF SOME ALGORITHMS [J].
洪加威 .
Science China Mathematics, 1979, (08) :890-900
[28]   Sums of Products of Polynomials in Few Variables: Lower Bounds and Polynomial Identity Testing [J].
Kumar, Mrinal ;
Saraf, Shubhangi .
31ST CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY (CCC 2016), 2016, 50
[29]   A spectral approach to lower bounds with applications to geometric searching [J].
Chazelle, B .
SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 1998, 27 (02) :545-556
[30]   Some Lower Bounds of Bandwidth Sum of Graphs with Applications [J].
Yuan JinjiangDepartment of MathematicsZhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouHuang QiongxiangDepartment of MathematicsXinjiang UniverisityUrumuqi .
应用数学, 1996, (04) :536-538