Cotton Yield and Canopy Closure in North Carolina as Influenced by Row Width, Plant Population, and Leaf Morphology

被引:8
作者
Riar, Ranjit [1 ]
Wells, Randy [1 ]
Edmisten, Keith [1 ]
Jordan, David [1 ]
Bacheler, Jack [2 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dep Crop Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Dep Entomol, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
LIGHT INTERCEPTION; ULTRA-NARROW; LINT YIELD; WATER-USE; DENSITIES; SPACINGS; COVERAGE; GROWTH;
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2012.08.0490
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield is partly determined by crop geometry, which is a function of row width and plant population. Field experiments were conducted in North Carolina during 2007 and 2008 to test the hypothesis that row width will be the determining factor in attaining canopy closure and hence greater fiber yield in North Carolina. The influences of both plant population and leaf morphology on the row width effects were also examined. Okra-leaf (FiberMax 800 BR) and normal-leaf (Fiber-Max 960 BR) cultivars were planted at 38- and 97-cm row widths at populations of 7, 12, and 18 plants m(-2). Cotton grown at 38- cm row width yielded more than cotton grown at 97-cm rows in some but not all environments. The percentage of canopy closure and the percentage of photosynthetically active radiation interception showed a close relationship over row width, leaf morphology, plant population, and environment (r(2) = 0.84, P < 0.001). Higher plant population increased light interception and canopy closure early in the season. However, with time, these differences were reduced and were absent by the last observations. Row width was an important cause of greater canopy closure but this did not consistently translate into yield differences and yields were more closely affected by cumulative rainfall. Economic analysis found no loss of profit in the lowest plant population in either row width indicating that seed costs could be reduced without decreasing yield.
引用
收藏
页码:1704 / 1711
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Adobe Systems, 1998, PHOT REL 5 0
[2]   Analysis of cotton yield stability across population densities [J].
Bednarz, CW ;
Bridges, DC ;
Brown, SM .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2000, 92 (01) :128-135
[3]  
Boykin JC, 2010, J COTTON SCI, V14, P205
[4]   Nitrogen fertilization and yield of cotton in ultra-narrow and conventional row spacings [J].
Clawson, EL ;
Cothren, JT ;
Blouin, DC .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2006, 98 (01) :72-79
[5]  
Fowler S.L., 1977, AGRON J, V69, P733, DOI [10.2134/agronj1977.00021962006900050001x, DOI 10.2134/AGR0NJ1977.00021962006900050001X]
[6]   Late season water stress in cotton .1. Plant growth, water use, and yield [J].
Gerik, TJ ;
Faver, KL ;
Thaxton, PM ;
ElZik, KM .
CROP SCIENCE, 1996, 36 (04) :914-921
[7]   Lower Limits of Cotton Seeding Rates in Alternative Row Widths and Patterns [J].
Gwathmey, C. Owen ;
Steckel, Lawrence E. ;
Larson, James A. ;
Mooney, Daniel F. .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2011, 103 (03) :584-592
[8]   CANOPY CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH DEFICIENT AND EXCESSIVE COTTON PLANT-POPULATION DENSITIES [J].
HEITHOLT, JJ .
CROP SCIENCE, 1994, 34 (05) :1291-1297
[9]   LIGHT INTERCEPTION AND LINT YIELD OF NARROW-ROW COTTON [J].
HEITHOLT, JJ ;
PETTIGREW, WT ;
MEREDITH, WR .
CROP SCIENCE, 1992, 32 (03) :728-733
[10]   EFFECTIVENESS OF FRUITING SITES IN COTTON - YIELD [J].
JENKINS, JN ;
MCCARTY, JC ;
PARROTT, WL .
CROP SCIENCE, 1990, 30 (02) :365-369