Nuclear binding energies:: Global collective structure and local shell-model correlations

被引:55
作者
Fossion, R
De Coster, C
García-Ramos, JE
Werner, T
Heyde, K
机构
[1] Dept Subatom & Radiat Phys, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Huelva, Dpto Fis Aplicada & Ingn Elect, EPS La Rabida, Palos De La Frontera 21819, Spain
[3] Univ Warsaw, Inst Theoret Phys, PL-00325 Warsaw, Poland
[4] CERN, EP ISOLDE, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
binding energies; two-neutron separation energies; liquid-drop model; shell model; interacting boson model; intruder states; macroscopic-microscopic model;
D O I
10.1016/S0375-9474(01)01270-2
中图分类号
O57 [原子核物理学、高能物理学];
学科分类号
070202 ;
摘要
Nuclear binding energies and two-neutron separation energies are analysed starting from the liquid-drop model and the nuclear shell model in order to describe the global trends of the above observables. We subsequently concentrate on the Interacting Boson Model (IBM) and discuss a new method in order to provide a consistent description of both, ground-state and excited-state properties. We address the artefacts that appear when crossing mid-shell using the IBM formulation and perform detailed numerical calculations for nuclei situated in the 50-82 shell. We also concentrate on local deviations from the above global trends in binding energy and two-neutron separation energies that appear in the neutron-deficient Pb region. We address possible effects on the binding energy, caused by mixing of low-lying 0(+) intruder states into the ground state, using configuration mixing in the IBM framework. We also study ground-state properties using a macroscopic-microscopic model. Detailed comparisons with recent experimental data in the Pb region are amply discussed. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 747
页数:45
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   NUCLEAR-MASS FORMULA VIA AN APPROXIMATION TO THE HARTREE-FOCK METHOD [J].
ABOUSSIR, Y ;
PEARSON, JM ;
DUTTA, AK ;
TONDEUR, F .
ATOMIC DATA AND NUCLEAR DATA TABLES, 1995, 61 (01) :127-176
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Algebraic Methods in Molecular and Nuclear Physics
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1971, NUCL DATA TABLES, VA9, P267
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, NUCL SHELL MODEL
[5]   THE 1993 ATOMIC MASS EVALUATION .4. EVALUATION OF INPUT DATA, ADJUSTMENT PROCEDURES [J].
AUDI, G ;
WAPSTRA, AH ;
DEDIEU, M .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 1993, 565 (01) :193-397
[6]   The 1995 update to the atomic mass evaluation [J].
Audi, G ;
Wapstra, AH .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 1995, 595 (04) :409-480
[7]   The NUBASE evaluation of nuclear and decay properties [J].
Audi, G ;
Bersillon, O ;
Blachot, J ;
Wapstra, AH .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 1997, 624 (01) :1-124
[8]   In-beam gamma-spectroscopy at GANIL: Present and future [J].
Azaiez, F .
PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 2000, T88 :118-121
[9]   THE INTERACTING BOSON MODEL APPLIED TO THE MERCURY ISOTOPES [J].
BARFIELD, AF ;
BARRETT, BR ;
SAGE, KA ;
DUVAL, PD .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHYSIK A-HADRONS AND NUCLEI, 1983, 311 (03) :205-215
[10]   Accurate masses of unstable rare-earth isotopes by ISOLTRAP [J].
Beck, D ;
Ames, F ;
Audi, G ;
Bollen, G ;
Herfurth, F ;
Kluge, HJ ;
Kohl, A ;
König, M ;
Lunney, D ;
Martel, I ;
Moore, RB ;
Raimbault-Hartmann, H ;
Schark, E ;
Schwarz, S ;
Simon, MD ;
Szerypo, J .
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL A, 2000, 8 (03) :307-329