A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Primary Anastomosis or Hartmann's Procedure for Perforated Left Colonic Diverticulitis With Purulent or Fecal Peritonitis

被引:262
作者
Oberkofler, Christian Eugen [1 ]
Rickenbacher, Andreas [1 ]
Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle [1 ]
Lehmann, Kuno [1 ]
Villiger, Peter [3 ]
Buchli, Christian [3 ]
Grieder, Felix [4 ]
Gelpke, Hans [4 ]
Decurtins, Marco [4 ]
Tempia-Caliera, Adrien A. [2 ]
Demartines, Nicolas [2 ]
Hahnloser, Dieter [2 ]
Clavien, Pierre-Alain [1 ]
Breitenstein, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Surg, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Lausanne Hosp, Dept Visceral Surg, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Cantonal Hosp, Dept Surg, Chur, Switzerland
[4] Cantonal Hosp, Dept Surg, Winterthur, Switzerland
关键词
colonic perforation; diverticulitis; Hartmann's procedure; protective ileostomy; rectosigmoid resection; MEDICAL DECISION-ANALYSIS; SIGMOID DIVERTICULITIS; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; PRIMARY RESECTION; SURGERY; MANAGEMENT; MORBIDITY; DISEASE; STOMA; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827324ba
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the outcome after Hartmann's procedure (HP) versus primary anastomosis (PA) with diverting ileostomy for perforated left-sided diverticulitis. Background: The surgical management of left-sided colonic perforation with purulent or fecal peritonitis remains controversial. PA with ileostomy seems to be superior to HP; however, results in the literature are affected by a significant selection bias. No randomized clinical trial has yet compared the 2 procedures. Methods: Sixty-two patients with acute left-sided colonic perforation (Hinchey III and IV) from 4 centers were randomized to HP (n = 30) and to PA (with diverting ileostomy, n = 32), with a planned stoma reversal operation after 3 months in both groups. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary end point was the overall complication rate. The study was discontinued following an interim analysis that found significant differences of relevant secondary end points as well as a decreasing accrual rate (NCT01233713). Results: Patient demographics were equally distributed in both groups (Hinchey III: 76% vs 75% and Hinchey IV: 24% vs 25%, for HP vs PA, respectively). The overall complication rate for both resection and stoma reversal operations was comparable (80% vs 84%, P = 0.813). Although the outcome after the initial colon resection did not show any significant differences (mortality 13% vs 9% and morbidity 67% vs 75% in HP vs PA), the stoma reversal rate after PA with diverting ileostomy was higher (90% vs 57%, P = 0.005) and serious complications (Grades IIIb-IV: 0% vs 20%, P = 0.046), operating time (73 minutes vs 183 minutes, P < 0.001), hospital stay (6 days vs 9 days, P = 0.016), and lower in-hospital costs (US $ 16,717 vs US $ 24,014) were significantly reduced in the PA group. Conclusions: This is the first randomized clinical trial favoring PA with diverting ileostomy over HP in patients with perforated diverticulitis.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 827
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [31] Primary anastomosis after intraoperative colonic lavage vs. Hartmann's procedure in generalized peritonitis complicating diverticular disease of the colon
    Regenet, N
    Pessaux, P
    Hennekinne, S
    Lermite, E
    Tuech, JJ
    Brehant, O
    Arnaud, JP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2003, 18 (06) : 503 - 507
  • [32] CHANGING PATTERNS IN THE SURGICAL-TREATMENT OF DIVERTICULAR-DISEASE
    RODKEY, GV
    WELCH, CE
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1984, 200 (04) : 466 - 478
  • [33] Hartmann's colectomy and reversal in diverticulitis: A population-level assessment
    Salem, L
    Anaya, DA
    Roberts, KF
    Flum, DR
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (05) : 988 - 995
  • [34] Primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure for patients with diverticular peritonitis? A systematic review
    Salem, L
    Flum, DR
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (11) : 1953 - 1964
  • [35] Primary vs. secondary anastomosis after sigmoid colon resection for perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey stage III and IV) -: A prospective outcome and cost analysis
    Schilling, MK
    Maurer, CA
    Kollmar, O
    Büchler, MW
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (05) : 699 - 703
  • [36] Schulz KF, 2010, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V63, P834, DOI [10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.005, 10.1136/bmj.c332, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.09.004, 10.4103/0976-500X.72352, 10.1136/bmj.c869, 10.1186/1741-7015-8-18]
  • [37] Seiler CA, 1998, ZBL CHIR, V123, P1394
  • [38] Generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis: Hartmann's procedure or primary anastomosis?
    Trenti, Loris
    Biondo, Sebastiano
    Golda, Thomas
    Monica, Millan
    Kreisler, Esther
    Fraccalvieri, Domenico
    Frago, Ricardo
    Jaurrieta, Eduardo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 26 (03) : 377 - 384
  • [39] NATIONAL AUDIT OF COMPLICATED DIVERTICULAR-DISEASE - ANALYSIS OF INDEX CASES
    TUDOR, RG
    FARMAKIS, N
    KEIGHLEY, MRB
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (05) : 730 - 732
  • [40] Restoration of bowel continuity after surgery for acute perforated diverticulitis: should Hartmann's procedure be considered a one-stage procedure?
    Vermeulen, J.
    Coene, P. P. L. O.
    Van Hout, N. M.
    van der Harst, E.
    Gosselink, M. P.
    Mannaerts, G. H. H.
    Weidema, W. F.
    Lange, J. F.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 11 (06) : 619 - 624