(Un)Sustainable Creativity? Different Manager-Employee Perspectives in the Finnish Technology Sector

被引:12
作者
Lemmetty, Soila [1 ]
Glaveanu, Vlad Petre [2 ]
Collin, Kaija [1 ]
Forsman, Panu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Educ, Alvar Aallon Katu 9, Jyvaskyla 40140, Finland
[2] Webster Univ, Dept Psychol & Profess Counselling, 15 Route Collex, CH-1293 Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
creativity; sustainability; Finland; technology sector; qualitative analysis; ORGANIZATIONS; WORK;
D O I
10.3390/su12093605
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The importance of creativity for working life and in organizations has increased in recent years. At the same time, the theme of sustainability has been intensely debated in research, society, and organizations. Together, creativity and sustainability have sometimes been described as a contradictory phenomenon: they are described in ways that place them in opposition to each other. To better understand creativity and sustainability and their differences from the perspective of people in different positions, we take advantage of a sociocultural approach in which we do not focus only on creative individuals but also on the impact of creativity on both organizational stakeholders and society at large. We aim to explore manager and employee descriptions of creativity and its relationship with sustainability at work in the Finnish technology sector, with a particular focus on how they relate to the sustainability of the creative processes and to workplace activities more generally. Based on a thematic analysis of 56 interviews, we found that the managers and employees in Finnish technology organizations described creativity in different ways, looking at the phenomenon from the viewpoints of clients, businesses, society, or colleagues, and had different perspectives on what it means to create, with the former treating creativity as huge innovations and the latter as daily problem-solving. We also found that sustainability in relation to creativity appears either as applying old solutions and thus recycling previous ideas or outcomes or as destroying old products and replacing them with the new (creative destruction). We discuss these partly conflicting discourses at the end of the article and present suggestions for future research.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据