Engineering students' preferences for active and non-active learning strategies in the classroom

被引:0
作者
Antonio Pow-Sang, Jose [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Peru, Dept Engn, Lima, Peru
来源
7TH INTERNACIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ACCREDITATION OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTING EDUCATION (ICACIT 2021) | 2021年
关键词
active learning; learning strategies; engineering education; computing education; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1109/ICACIT53544.2021.9612487
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Instructors employ different teaching and learning strategies in the classroom. Although they traditionally give lectures to teach a topic, some of them also use active learning strategies. The literature shows the advantages of using active learning strategies compared to traditional teaching; however, there could be some resistance in their application between students and teachers. This paper shows part of the results of a study that focuses on investigating factors that can influence the adoption of active learning in the classroom in computing and engineering undergraduate programs. A questionnaire was applied to engineering students at a Peruvian university to determine their preferences in the teaching-learning strategies used by lecturers in the classroom. In general, it was observed that students positively value active and non-active (or traditional) learning strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Perceptions on the effectiveness of active learning strategies
    Daouk, Zeina
    Bahous, Rima
    Bacha, Nahla Nola
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 8 (03) : 360 - 375
  • [32] A case study in active learning: Teaching undergraduate research in an engineering classroom setting
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, United States
    不详
    不详
    Eng. Educ., 2013, 2 (54-64): : 54 - 64
  • [33] Instructor use of a flexible classroom to facilitate active learning in undergraduate engineering courses
    Johnson, Aaron W.
    Su, Magel P.
    Blackburn, Max W.
    Finelli, Cynthia J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2021, 46 (04) : 618 - 635
  • [34] INTEGRATION OF GAMIFICATION AND ACTIVE LEARNING IN THE CLASSROOM
    Zepeda-Hernandez, Sergio
    Abascal-Mena, Rocio
    Lopez-Ornelas, Erick
    REVISTA RA XIMHAI, 2016, 12 (06): : 315 - 325
  • [35] The Impact of active learning strategies in second cycle students of an engineer course: a case study
    De Oliveira, Cristina Gaspar
    Andre, Paulo
    2014 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2014,
  • [36] Students' Expectations, Types of Instruction, and Instructor Strategies Predicting Student Response to Active Learning
    Kevin Nguyen
    Husman, Jenefer
    Borrego, Maura
    Shekhar, Prateek
    Prince, Michael
    Demonbrun, Matt
    Finelli, Cynthia
    Henderson, Charles
    Waters, Cynthia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2017, 33 (01) : 2 - 18
  • [37] Bringing active learning into the accounting classroom
    Sugahara, Satoshi
    Dellaportas, Steven
    MEDITARI ACCOUNTANCY RESEARCH, 2018, 26 (04) : 576 - 597
  • [38] The State of Active Learning in the Hospitality Classroom
    La Lopa, Joseph M.
    Elsayed, Yousery Nabil M. K.
    Wray, Michael L.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY & TOURISM EDUCATION, 2018, 30 (02) : 95 - 108
  • [39] Interactive Visualization for the Active Learning Classroom
    Schweitzer, Dino
    Brown, Wayne
    SIGCSE 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-EIGHTH SIGCSE TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2007, : 208 - 212
  • [40] A tool for measuring active learning in the classroom
    Van Amburgh, Jenny A.
    Devlin, John W.
    Kirwin, Jennifer L.
    Qualters, Donna M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 71 (05)