When to control for covariates? Panel asymptotics for estimates of treatment effects

被引:39
作者
Angrist, J [1 ]
Hahn, JY
机构
[1] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1162/003465304323023679
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The problem of when to control for continuous or high-dimensional discrete covariate vectors arises in both experimental and observational studies. Large-cell asymptotic arguments suggest that full control for covariates or stratification variables is always efficient, even if treatment is assigned independently of covariates or strata. Here, we approximate the behavior of different estimators using a panel-data-type asymptotic sequence with fixed cell sizes and the number of cells increasing to infinity. Exact calculations in simple examples and Monte Carlo evidence suggest this generates a substantially improved approximation to actual finite-sample distributions. Under this sequence, full control for covariates is dominated by propensity-score matching when cell sizes are small, the explanatory power of the covariates conditional on the propensity score is low, and/or the probability of treatment is close to 0 or 1. Our panel-asymptotic framework also provides an explanation for why propensity-score matching can dominate covariate matching even when there are no empty cells. Finally, we introduce a random-effects estimator that provides finite-sample efficiency gains over both covariate matching and propensity-score matching.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 72
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
ABADIE A, 2002, UNPUB SIMPLE BIAS CO
[2]  
ANGRIST J, 1999, 241 NBER
[3]   Estimating the labor market impact of voluntary military service using social security data on military applicants [J].
Angrist, JD .
ECONOMETRICA, 1998, 66 (02) :249-288
[4]   SPLIT-SAMPLE INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES ESTIMATES OF THE RETURN TO SCHOOLING [J].
ANGRIST, JD ;
KRUEGER, AB .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 1995, 13 (02) :225-235
[5]   USING THE LONGITUDINAL STRUCTURE OF EARNINGS TO ESTIMATE THE EFFECT OF TRAINING-PROGRAMS [J].
ASHENFELTER, O ;
CARD, D .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1985, 67 (04) :648-660
[6]   ALTERNATIVE APPROXIMATIONS TO THE DISTRIBUTIONS OF INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATORS [J].
BEKKER, PA .
ECONOMETRICA, 1994, 62 (03) :657-681
[7]  
BEKKER PA, 1996, UNPUB INSTRUMENTAL V
[8]   MEASURING THE EFFECT OF SUBSIDIZED TRAINING-PROGRAMS ON MOVEMENTS IN AND OUT OF EMPLOYMENT [J].
CARD, D ;
SULLIVAN, D .
ECONOMETRICA, 1988, 56 (03) :497-530
[9]   EFFICIENCY BOUNDS FOR SEMIPARAMETRIC REGRESSION [J].
CHAMBERLAIN, G .
ECONOMETRICA, 1992, 60 (03) :567-596
[10]   ASYMPTOTIC EFFICIENCY IN ESTIMATION WITH CONDITIONAL MOMENT RESTRICTIONS [J].
CHAMBERLAIN, G .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1987, 34 (03) :305-334