The Feelings About genomiC Testing Results (FACToR) Questionnaire: Development and Preliminary Validation

被引:42
作者
Li, Meng [1 ]
Bennette, Caroline S. [2 ]
Amendola, Laura M. [3 ]
Hart, M. Ragan [3 ]
Heagerty, Patrick [4 ]
Comstock, Bryan [4 ]
Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter [5 ]
Fullerton, Stephanie M. [6 ]
Regier, Dean A. [7 ]
Burke, Wylie [6 ]
Trinidad, Susan B. [6 ]
Jarvik, Gail P. [3 ]
Veenstra, David L. [1 ]
Patrick, Donald L. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Pharm, Pharmaceut Outcomes Res & Policy Program, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Flatiron Hlth, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Washington, Div Med Genet, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Dept Biomed Informat & Med Educ, Seattle, WA USA
[6] Univ Washington, Dept Bioeth & Humanities, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] BC Canc Agcy, Canc Control Res, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[8] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv, Box 357660, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Genomic testing; Psychological impact; Instrument development and validation; Colorectal cancer; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK-ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT; GENETIC INFORMATION; MENTAL-HEALTH; CANCER RISK; PERCEPTIONS; VALIDITY; SCALE; DISCRIMINATION; DISTRESS;
D O I
10.1007/s10897-018-0286-9
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to develop a brief instrument, the Feelings About genomiC Testing Results (FACToR), to measure the psychosocial impact of returning genomic findings to patients in research and clinical practice. To create the FACToR, we modified and augmented the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire based on findings from a literature review, two focus groups (N=12), and cognitive interviews (N=6). We evaluated data from 122 participants referred for evaluation for inherited colorectal cancer or polyposis from the New EXome Technology in (NEXT) Medicine Study, an RCT of exome sequencing versus usual care. We assessed floor and ceiling effects of each item, conducted principal component analysis to identify subscales, and evaluated each subscale's internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity. After excluding items that were ambiguous or demonstrated floor or ceiling effects, 12 items forming four distinct subscales were retained for further analysis: negative emotions, positive feelings, uncertainty, and privacy concerns. All four showed good internal consistency (0.66-0.78) and test-retest reliability (0.65-0.91). The positive feelings and the uncertainty subscales demonstrated known-group validity. The 12-item FACToR with four subscales shows promising psychometric properties on preliminary evaluation in a limited sample and needs to be evaluated in other populations.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 490
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Perceptions of genetic discrimination among at-risk relatives of colorectal cancer patients
    Apse, KA
    Biesecker, BB
    Giardiello, FM
    Fuller, BP
    Bernhardt, BA
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 6 (06) : 510 - 516
  • [2] PERFORMANCE OF A 5-ITEM MENTAL-HEALTH SCREENING-TEST
    BERWICK, DM
    MURPHY, JM
    GOLDMAN, PA
    WARE, JE
    BARSKY, AJ
    WEINSTEIN, MC
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1991, 29 (02) : 169 - 176
  • [3] PUGS: A novel scale to assess perceptions of uncertainties in genome sequencing
    Biesecker, B. B.
    Woolford, S. W.
    Klein, W. M. P.
    Brothers, K. B.
    Umstead, K. L.
    Lewis, K. L.
    Biesecker, L. G.
    Han, P. . K. J.
    [J]. CLINICAL GENETICS, 2017, 92 (02) : 172 - 179
  • [4] Perceptions of genetic discrimination among people at risk for Huntington's disease: a cross sectional survey
    Bombard, Yvonne
    Veenstra, Gerry
    Friedman, Jan M.
    Creighton, Susan
    Currie, Lauren
    Paulsen, Jane S.
    Bottorff, Joan L.
    Hayden, Michael R.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338
  • [5] Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review
    Broadstock, M
    Michie, S
    Marteau, T
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2000, 8 (10) : 731 - 738
  • [6] A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: The Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire
    Cella, D
    Hughes, C
    Peterman, A
    Chang, CH
    Peshkin, BN
    Schwartz, MD
    Wenzel, L
    Lemke, A
    Marcus, AC
    Lerman, C
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 21 (06) : 564 - 572
  • [7] Effect of genetic testing for risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus on health behaviors and outcomes: study rationale, development and design
    Cho, Alex H.
    Killeya-Jones, Ley A.
    O'Daniel, Julianne M.
    Kawamoto, Kensaku
    Gallagher, Patrick
    Haga, Susanne
    Lucas, Joseph E.
    Trujillo, Gloria M.
    Joy, Scott V.
    Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2012, 12
  • [8] A New Scale Measuring Psychologic Impact of Genetic Susceptibility Testing for Alzheimer Disease
    Chung, Winston W.
    Chen, Clara A.
    Cupples, L. Adrienne
    Roberts, J. Scott
    Hiraki, Susan C.
    Nair, Anil K.
    Green, Robert C.
    Stern, Robert A.
    [J]. ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS, 2009, 23 (01) : 50 - 56
  • [9] The Psychological Impact of Predictive Genetic Testing for Huntington's Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Crozier, S.
    Robertson, N.
    Dale, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2015, 24 (01) : 29 - 39
  • [10] Behavioral and psychosocial responses to genomic testing for colorectal cancer risk
    Graves, Kristi D.
    Leventhal, Kara-Grace
    Nusbaum, Rachel
    Salehizadeh, Yasmin
    Hooker, Gillian W.
    Peshkin, Beth N.
    Butrick, Morgan
    Tuong, William
    Mathew, Jeena
    Goerlitz, David
    Fishman, Mary B.
    Shields, Peter G.
    Schwartz, Marc D.
    [J]. GENOMICS, 2013, 102 (02) : 123 - 130