Evolution of sustainability indicator worldwide: A study from the economic perspective based on the X-STATICO method

被引:30
作者
Gallego-Alvarez, Isabel [1 ]
Purificacion Galindo-Villardon, Ma [2 ]
Rodriguez-Rosa, Miguel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, Dept Business Adm, Salamanca 37007, Spain
[2] Univ Salamanca, Dept Stat, Salamanca 37007, Spain
关键词
Sustainability indicators; Sustainable Society Index; Economic index; Social index; Environmental index; Countries worldwide; X-STATIS; X-STATICO; ENVIRONMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.025
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Sustainability is becoming an ever greater concern in society as it will affect future generations. Since the Brundtland Report defined the concept of sustainability in 1987, several different indices and indicators have been developed in this area. However, at present, there is no widely accepted indicator of sustainability. Some of the indicators currently used have been established by the OECD and the UN, among others, but the Sustainable Society Index (SSI), developed in 2006, covers three aspects: economic, social and environmental (Van de Kerk and Manuel, 2012). With regard to the SSI, the objective of this study was to analyze the evolution of its indicators over the period 2006-2012. In addition, we consider the evolution of sustainability indicators in different countries within different geographical areas. We thus assessed the spatio-temporal structure of countries worldwide according to the SSI using X-STATIS and X-STATICO in combination with a common tool in statistics, the spider graph. From a methodological point of view, X-STATIS and X-STATICO offer a rigorous theoretical framework for the simultaneous analysis of a three-dimensional set of data. Applied in the field of sustainability, this method constitutes a relevant way of analysing the spatio-temporal organization of countries. Our findings show that by applying these three-way methods, a differentiation can be observed in the sustainability indicators in the period analyzed (2006-2012) towards a greater emphasis on economic indicators, especially public debt, genuine savings and employment. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 151
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [31] Environmental performance, indicators and measurement uncertainty in EMS context: a case study
    Perotto, Eleonora
    Canziani, Roberto
    Marchesi, Renzo
    Butelli, Paola
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2008, 16 (04) : 517 - 530
  • [32] Bellagio STAMP: Principles for sustainability assessment and measurement
    Pinter, Laszlo
    Hardi, Peter
    Martinuzzi, Andre
    Hall, Jon
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 17 : 20 - 28
  • [33] Meta-performance evaluation of sustainability indicators
    Ramos, Tomas B.
    Caeiro, Sandra
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2010, 10 (02) : 157 - 166
  • [34] From sustainability to well-being: Lessons learned from the use of sustainable development indicators at national and EU level
    Rinne, Janne
    Lyytimaki, Jari
    Kautto, Petrus
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 35 : 35 - 42
  • [35] ROBERT P, 1976, ROY STAT SOC C-APP, V25, P257
  • [36] Saisana M., 2012, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.EIAR.2011.06.001, 10.2788/6330]
  • [37] An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies
    Singh, Rajesh Kumar
    Murty, H. R.
    Gupta, S. K.
    Dikshit, A. K.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2009, 9 (02) : 189 - 212
  • [38] Objectives and Indicators in Sustainable Development Strategies: Similarities and Variances across Europe
    Steurer, Reinhard
    Hametner, Markus
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 21 (04) : 224 - 241
  • [39] ADE-4: A multivariate analysis and graphical display software
    Thioulouse, J
    Chessel, D
    Doledec, S
    Olivier, JM
    [J]. STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 1997, 7 (01) : 75 - 83
  • [40] SIMULTANEOUS ANALYSIS OF A SEQUENCE OF PAIRED ECOLOGICAL TABLES: A COMPARISON OF SEVERAL METHODS
    Thioulouse, Jean
    [J]. ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2011, 5 (04) : 2300 - 2325