ESSENTIAL FEATURES OF TIER 2 SOCIAL-BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS

被引:5
作者
Yong, Minglee [1 ]
Cheney, Douglas A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
VIOLENCE PREVENTION PROGRAMS; SCHOOL-BASED PREVENTION; PUBLIC-HEALTH IMPACT; SECONDARY PREVENTION; CHILDREN; IMPLEMENTATION; CHALLENGES; EDUCATION; SYSTEMS; YOUTH;
D O I
10.1002/pits.21710
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to identify the essential features of Tier 2 interventions conducted within multitier systems of behavior support in schools. A systematic literature search identified 12 empirical studies that were coded and scored according to a list of Tier 2 specific RE-AIM criteria, related to the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance. Most studies met the following criteria: efficient identification of students, training required for staff implementation, integration with Tier 1 support, standard protocol approach, assessment of implementation fidelity, and parental involvement. However, there was less consistency in meeting the following criteria: reliable and valid methods for student identification, weekly data review to monitor progress, evaluation of behavioral and learning outcomes, program length of between 2 to 6 months, use of maintenance strategies, and teacher involvement. For the subsequent descriptive analysis, the 12 studies were categorized into 6 groups and the strategies used to address RE-AIM criteria were compared and discussed. The essential features identified will help researchers replicate Tier 2 interventions and help schools select and adapt Tier 2 interventions that are matched to their needs and resources. (C) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:844 / 861
页数:18
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]   INTEGRATED MODELS OF SCHOOL-BASED PREVENTION: LOGIC AND THEORY [J].
Domitrovich, Celene E. ;
Bradshaw, Catherine P. ;
Greenberg, Mark T. ;
Embry, Dennis ;
Poduska, Jeanne M. ;
Ialongo, Nicholas S. .
PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2010, 47 (01) :71-88
[12]   Evaluation of indicated preventive intervention (secondary prevention) mental health programs for children and adolescents [J].
Durlak, JA ;
Wells, AM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 26 (05) :775-802
[13]   Reaching those most in need: a review of diabetes self-management interventions in disadvantaged populations [J].
Eakin, EG ;
Bull, SS ;
Glasgow, RE ;
Mason, M .
DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2002, 18 (01) :26-35
[14]   Response to intervention: Examining classroom behavior support in second grade [J].
Fairbanks, Sarah ;
Sugai, George ;
Guardino, David ;
Lathrop, Margaret .
EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2007, 73 (03) :288-310
[15]  
Filter K.J., 2007, Education and Treatment of Children, V30, P69, DOI DOI 10.1353/ETC.2007.0000
[16]  
Forness SR, 2005, BEHAV DISORDERS, V30, P311
[17]   Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? [J].
Fuchs, D ;
Fuchs, LS .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2006, 41 (01) :93-99
[18]   Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework [J].
Glasgow, RE ;
Vogt, TM ;
Boles, SM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (09) :1322-1327
[19]   Considerations for evaluating universal screening assessments [J].
Glover, Todd A. ;
Albers, Craig A. .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 45 (02) :117-135
[20]   Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning [J].
Greenberg, MT ;
Weissberg, RP ;
O'Brien, MU ;
Zins, JE ;
Fredericks, L ;
Resnik, H ;
Elias, MJ .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2003, 58 (6-7) :466-474