Characterization of intracalyceal pressure during ureteroscopy

被引:43
作者
Patel, Roshan M. [1 ]
Jefferson, Francis A. [1 ]
Owyong, Michael [1 ]
Hofmann, Martin [1 ]
Ayad, Maged L. [1 ]
Osann, Kathryn [1 ]
Okhunov, Zhamshid [1 ]
Landman, Jaime [1 ]
Clayman, Ralph V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, 333 City Blvd West,Suite 2100, Orange, CA 92868 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Ureteroscopy; Nephrolithiasis; Ureteral access sheath; Urolithiasis; Laser lithotripsy; Pressure; RENAL PELVIC PRESSURE; URETERAL ACCESS SHEATH; FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY; IRRIGATION SYSTEMS; LITHOTRIPSY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-020-03259-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To provide the first report of measuring intracalyceal pressures during ureteroscopy (URS). Methods A prospective single-center clinical study using a cardiac pressure guidewire to measure intracalyceal pressure during flexible URS was performed. Eight patients (45 calyces) undergoing URS for nephrolithiasis were included. A Verrata(R)pressure guide wire was passed through the working channel of a dual lumen flexible ureteroscope and into the calyces while irrigation was maintained at 150 mmHg. Pressure was measured in the renal pelvis, upper pole, interpolar, and lower pole calyces both with and without a ureteral access sheath (UAS). The pressure in each location with and without a UAS was compared. The correlation between calyceal pressure and infundibular dimensions (width, length) was determined. Results Intracalyceal pressure was significantly lower in each region when a UAS was used. Compared to patients with a 12/14Fr UAS, those with a 14/16Fr UAS had significantly lower pressure in the interpolar (25.3 +/- 13.1 vs. 44.0 +/- 27.5 mmHg,p = 0.03) and lower pole (16.2 +/- 3.5 vs. 49.2 +/- 40.3 mmHg,p = 0.004) calyces. Interpolar calyceal pressure in the presence of a UAS was significantly higher than the renal pelvis pressure (RPP) (30.8 +/- 19.6 vs. 17.9 +/- 11.0 mmHg,p = 0.004). Conclusions During flexible URS, RPP strongly correlates with, but does not uniformly represent, the intracalyceal pressure. With a 14/16Fr UAS and an inflow pressure of 150 mmHg, RPP and intracalyceal pressure never exceed the threshold for renal backflow.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 889
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[21]   Endoscopic Valves and Irrigation Devices for Flexible Ureteroscopy: Is There a Difference? [J].
Tarplin, Sarah ;
Byrne, Michael ;
Farrell, Nolan ;
Monga, Manoj ;
Sivalingam, Sri .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2015, 29 (09) :983-992
[22]  
THOMSEN HS, 1984, DAN MED BULL, V31, P438
[23]   Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study [J].
Traxer, Olivier ;
Wendt-Nordahl, Gunnar ;
Sodha, Hiren ;
Rassweiler, Jens ;
Meretyk, Shimon ;
Tefekli, Ahmet ;
Coz, Fernando ;
de la Rosette, Jean J. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 33 (12) :2137-2144
[24]   Ureteral access strategies: pro-access sheath [J].
Vanlangendonck, R ;
Landman, J .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 31 (01) :71-+
[25]   Does a Smaller Tract in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Contribute to High Renal Pelvic Pressure and Postoperative Fever? [J].
Zhong, Wen ;
Zeng, Guohua ;
Wu, Kaijun ;
Li, Xun ;
Chen, Wenzhong ;
Yang, Houmeng .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (09) :2147-2151
[26]   Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome After Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: A Study of Risk Factors [J].
Zhong, Wen ;
Leto, Gioacchino ;
Wang, Liang ;
Zeng, Guohua .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2015, 29 (01) :25-28