Context Sensitive Technologies and Electronic Employee Monitoring: a Meta-Analytic Review

被引:0
作者
Backhaus, Nils [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Inst Occupat Safety & Hlth BAuA, Grp Changing World Work Human Factors & Ergon, Dortmund, Germany
来源
2019 IEEE/SICE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SYSTEM INTEGRATION (SII) | 2019年
关键词
context sensitivity; electronic monitoring; human-machine interaction; psychological demands; review; WORKPLACE SURVEILLANCE; PERFORMANCE; WORK; JOB; FAIRNESS; CONSEQUENCES; PERCEPTIONS; ANTECEDENTS; MANAGEMENT; STRESS;
D O I
10.1109/sii.2019.8700354
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Digitized, interconnected work environments become increasingly popular. It is assumed that these system support employees in their daily routine and reduce mental demand and stress at work. However, context-aware systems entail the potential for comprehensive electronic workplace monitoring. This contribution reviews the influence of electronic monitoring on outcome variables, such as performance, psychological stress and strain, work motivation, satisfaction and behavior. 85 studies have been identified and prepared both qualitatively and meta-analytically. There were heterogeneous findings for employee performance. Mild adverse effects of monitoring on perceived stress, mental demand, job motivation and satisfaction, as well as organizational trust and perceived control could be found. Significant design recommendations were made in order to increase acceptance and avoid adverse monitoring effects. Most of the studies were based on cross-sectional correlative or quasi-experimental survey designs. As a result, ascertained design knowledge requires more longitudinal studies and systematic interventions of electronic monitoring in the field.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 553
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Schizophrenia and creativity: A meta-analytic review [J].
Acar, Selcuk ;
Chen, Xiao ;
Cayirdag, Nur .
SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2018, 195 :23-31
[22]   Are information asymmetry and sharing good, bad, or context dependent? A meta-analytic review [J].
Tong, Pui Ying ;
Crosno, Jody L. .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2016, 56 :167-180
[23]   Meta-analytic Review of Firm Reputation and Firm Performance [J].
Jeon, Hyo Jin Jean ;
Nolan, John .
CORPORATE REPUTATION REVIEW, 2024, 27 (03) :216-227
[24]   Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review [J].
Harms, P. D. ;
Crede, Marcus ;
Tynan, Michael ;
Leon, Matthew ;
Jeung, Wonho .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2017, 28 (01) :178-194
[25]   Collaborative Dishonesty: A Meta-Analytic Review [J].
Leib, Margarita ;
Koebis, Nils ;
Soraperra, Ivan ;
Weisel, Ori ;
Shalvi, Shaul .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2021, 147 (12) :1241-1268
[26]   Consumer confusion: A meta-analytic review [J].
Shahid, Shadma ;
Maseeh, Haroon Iqbal ;
Jebarajakirthy, Charles ;
Sharma, Bhuvanesh Kumar ;
Saha, Raiswa ;
Gupta, Shubhi .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2025, 192
[27]   Psychological Empowerment and Job Satisfaction: A Meta-analytic Review [J].
Mathew, Jain ;
Nair, Sridevi .
VISION-THE JOURNAL OF BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE, 2022, 26 (04) :431-440
[28]   Stress Reduction Through Psychoeducation: A Meta-Analytic Review [J].
Van Daele, Tom ;
Hermans, Dirk ;
Van Audenhove, Chantal ;
Van den Bergh, Omer .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2012, 39 (04) :474-485
[29]   Emotional intelligence and servant leadership: A meta-analytic review [J].
Miao, Chao ;
Humphrey, Ronald H. ;
Qian, Shanshan .
BUSINESS ETHICS THE ENVIRONMENT & RESPONSIBILITY, 2021, 30 (02) :231-243
[30]   A Meta-Analytic Literature Review on Organization-Level Drivers of Team Learning [J].
Nellen, Lydia C. ;
Gijselaers, Wim H. ;
Grohnert, Therese .
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2020, 19 (02) :152-182