Assessing the impact of socio-economic status on cancer survival in New South Wales, Australia 1996-2001

被引:68
作者
Yu, Xue Qin [1 ,2 ]
O'Connell, Dianne L. [2 ]
Gibberd, Robert W. [3 ]
Armstrong, Bruce K. [4 ]
机构
[1] Amer Canc Soc, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] NSW Canc Council, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Relative survival; Relative excess risk; Population-based cancer registry; Disparities; Socio-economic status;
D O I
10.1007/s10552-008-9210-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To assess the impact of socio-economic status (SES) on cancer survival in the state of New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Patients diagnosed with one of 13 major cancers during 1992-2000 in NSW were followed-up to the end of 2001. The effect of SES on survival was estimated for each individual cancer and all 13 cancers combined using multivariable modeling. The numbers of lives that could be extended if all people had the same level of excess risk of death due to cancer as patients in the highest SES areas were also estimated. There were highly statistically significant variations in survival across SES groups for four cancers: stomach, liver, lung, and breast and all 13 cancers combined. Variation remained highly significant after adjusting for disease stage. Patients in lower SES areas had 10-20% higher excess risk than those in the highest SES areas. In total, there were 3,346 lives potentially extendable beyond 5 years; the highest number was for lung cancer (756). The significantly worse survival in lower SES areas from cancers of the stomach, liver, lung, and breast may be due to poorer access to high-quality cancer care. Estimates of the number of lives potentially extendable by improving cancer survival in lower SES areas suggest that priority should be given to improving lung cancer care in lower SES areas in NSW, Australia.
引用
收藏
页码:1383 / 1390
页数:8
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] *AUSTR BUR STAT, 1998, INF PAP 1996 CENS SO
  • [2] *AUSTR I HLTH WELF, 2003, CANC SURV AUSTR 1992
  • [3] THE RELATION BETWEEN HEALTH-INSURANCE COVERAGE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES AMONG WOMEN WITH BREAST-CANCER
    AYANIAN, JZ
    KOHLER, BA
    ABE, T
    EPSTEIN, AM
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (05) : 326 - 331
  • [4] BERKSON J, 1950, P STAFF M MAYO CLIN, V25, P270
  • [5] Survival for eight major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995-99: results of the EUROCARE-4 study
    Berrino, Franco
    De Angelis, Roberta
    Sant, Milena
    Rosso, Stefano
    Lasota, Magdalena B.
    Coebergh, Jan W.
    Santaquilani, Mariano
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (09) : 773 - 783
  • [6] Social class is an important and independent prognostic factor of breast cancer mortality
    Bouchardy, Christine
    Verkooijen, Helena M.
    Fioretta, Gerald
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 119 (05) : 1145 - 1151
  • [7] Explaining the socioeconomic variation in cancer risk in the Norwegian women and cancer study
    Braaten, T
    Weiderpass, E
    Kumle, M
    Lund, E
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2005, 14 (11) : 2591 - 2597
  • [8] Hybrid analysis for up-to-date long-term survival rates in cancer registries with delayed recording of incident cases
    Brenner, H
    Rachet, B
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (16) : 2494 - 2501
  • [9] Deriving more up-to-date estimates of long-term patient survival
    Brenner, H
    Gefeller, O
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (02) : 211 - 216
  • [10] Brenner H, 1996, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V78, P2004, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961101)78:9<2004::AID-CNCR23>3.3.CO