ParEGO: A hybrid algorithm with on-line landscape approximation for expensive multiobjective optimization problems

被引:757
作者
Knowles, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Chem, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
design and analysis of computer experiments (DACE); efficient global optimization (EGO); expensive black-box functions; Kriging; landscape approximation; metamodels; multiobjective optimization; nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II); Pareto optima; performance assessment; response surfaces; test suites;
D O I
10.1109/TEVC.2005.851274
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper concerns multiobjective optimization in scenarios where each solution evaluation is financially and/or temporally expensive. We make use of nine relatively low-dimensional, nonpathological, real-valued functions, such as arise in many applications, and assess the performance of two algorithms after just 100 and 250 (or 260) function evaluations. The results show that NSGA-II, a popular multiobjective evolutionary algorithm, performs well compared with random search, even within the restricted number of evaluations used. A significantly better performance (particularly, in the worst case) is, however, achieved on our test set by an algorithm proposed herein-ParEGO-which is an extension of the single-objective efficient global optimization (EGO) algorithm of Jones et al. ParEGO uses a design-of-experiments inspired initialization procedure and learns a Gaussian processes model of the search landscape, which is updated after every function evaluation. Overall, ParEGO exhibits a promising performance for multiobjective optimization problems where evaluations are expensive or otherwise restricted in number.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 66
页数:17
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], STUDIES FUZZINESS SO
  • [2] Box G, 1987, EMPIRICAL MODEL BUIL
  • [3] A metabolome pipeline: from concept to data to knowledge
    Brown, Marie
    Dunn, Warwick B.
    Ellis, David I.
    Goodacre, Royston
    Handl, Julia
    Knowles, Joshua D.
    O'Hagan, Steve
    Spasic, Irena
    Kell, Douglas B.
    [J]. METABOLOMICS, 2005, 1 (01) : 39 - 51
  • [4] Accelerating evolutionary algorithms with Gaussian process fitness function models
    Büche, D
    Schraudolph, NN
    Koumoutsakos, P
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART C-APPLICATIONS AND REVIEWS, 2005, 35 (02): : 183 - 194
  • [5] Buche D., 2002, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN VII. 7th International Conference. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol.2439), P122
  • [6] Cheung PB, 2003, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2632, P662
  • [7] Coello C. A. C., 2002, EVOLUTIONARY ALGORIT
  • [8] Coello CAC, 2004, IEEE T EVOLUT COMPUT, V8, P256, DOI [10.1109/TEVC.2004.826067, 10.1109/tevc.2004.826067]
  • [9] Coello CAC, 2001, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V1993, P126
  • [10] An updated survey of GA-based multiobjective optimization techniques
    Coello, CAC
    [J]. ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2000, 32 (02) : 109 - 143