共 50 条
Complications of Percutaneous Bone Tumor Cryoablation: A 10-year Experience
被引:71
|作者:
Auloge, Pierre
[1
]
Cazzato, Roberto L.
[1
]
Rousseau, Chloe
[2
,3
]
Caudrelier, Jean
[1
]
Koch, Guillaume
[1
]
Rao, Pramod
[4
,5
,6
]
Chiang, Jeanie Betsy
[7
]
Garnon, Julien
[1
]
Gangi, Afshin
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Hosp Strasbourg, Nouvel Hop Civil, Dept Intervent Radiol, 1 Pl Hop,BP 426, F-67091 Strasbourg, France
[2] Univ Hosp Rennes, Clin Invest Ctr, INSERM 1414, Rennes, France
[3] Univ Rennes, Rennes, France
[4] Univ Strasbourg, Div Robot, ICube, Strasbourg, France
[5] Univ Strasbourg, Dept Intervent Radiol, ICube, Strasbourg, France
[6] Nouvel Hop Civil, Strasbourg, France
[7] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Radiol & Imaging, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源:
关键词:
RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA;
OSTEOID OSTEOMA;
ABLATION;
METASTASES;
MANAGEMENT;
OUTCOMES;
BIOPSY;
NEEDLE;
D O I:
10.1148/radiol.2019181262
中图分类号:
R8 [特种医学];
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100207 ;
1009 ;
摘要:
Background: Percutaneous cryoablation has been shown to be effective in the management of painful bone tumors. However, knowledge of the complication rate and risk factors for complication is currently lacking. Purpose: To report the complication rate and associated risk factors for bone tumor cryoablation. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study reviewed complications in 239 consecutive patients (131 men and 108 women; median age, 64 years; age range, 6-86 years) who underwent cryoablation of 320 primary or metastatic bone tumors between January 2008 and November 2017. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events was used to categorize complications as major (grade 3-4) or minor (grade 1-2). Multivariable analysis was performed for variables with P values less than.20, including age, tumor location, adjacent critical structures, number of cryoprobes, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS). Results: Among the 320 tumors, the total complication rate was 9.1% (29 of 320; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6%, 12.2%). The major complication rate was 2.5% (eight of 320; 95% CI: 0.8%, 4.2%), with secondary fracture the most frequent complication (1.2% [four of 320]; mean delay, 71 days); cryoablation site infection, tumor seeding, bleeding, and severe hypotension were each observed in 0.3% (one of 320) of procedures. Minor complications included postprocedural pain (2.2% [seven of 320]), peripheral neuropathy (0.9% [three of 320]), and temporary paresthesia (0.9% [three of 320]). For all complications, associated risk factors included ECOG-PS greater than 2 (odds ratio [OR], 3.1 [95% CI: 3, 7.6]; P =.01), long-bone cryoablation (OR, 17.8 [95% CI: 2.3, 136.3]; P =.01), and use of more than three cryoprobes (OR, 2.5 [95% CI: 1.0, 6.0]; P =.04); for major complications, associated risk factors included age greater than 70 years OR, 7.1 [95% CI: 1.6, 31.7]; P =.01) and use of more than three cryoprobes (OR, 23.6 [95% CI: 2.8, 199.0]; P =.01). Conclusion: Bone tumor cryoablation is safe, with a 2.5% rate of major complications, most commonly secondary fracture (1.2%). Major complications are associated with age greater than 70 years and use of more than three cryoprobes. (c) RSNA, 2019
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 527
页数:8
相关论文