Extent and Histologic Pattern of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Present on Core Needle Biopsy Specimens of the Breast Can Predict Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Subsequent Excision

被引:68
作者
Wagoner, Michael J. [2 ]
Laronga, Christine [3 ]
Acs, Geza [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr, Dept Anat Pathol, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, Dept Pathol & Cell Biol, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[3] Univ S Florida, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr, Comprehens Breast Program, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
关键词
Atypical ductal hyperplasia; Core needle biopsy; Ductal carcinoma in situ; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; SURGICAL EXCISION; LESIONS; UNDERESTIMATION; 11-GAUGE; CANCER; DIAGNOSIS; MICROCALCIFICATIONS; HETEROGENEITY; MALIGNANCY;
D O I
10.1309/AJCPGHEJ2R8UYFGP
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
A typical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) diagnosed by core needle biopsy (CNB) is regarded as an indication for surgical excision. We investigated whether histologic subtype and extent of ADH in a series of 123 CNB specimens can predict the presence of carcinoma on surgical excision. We found that ADH present in more than 2 foci in CNB specimens was a strong predictor of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on excision (>2 foci, 16/41 vs 6/82 for 1 or 2 foci; P < .0001). The micropapillary subtype of ADH also predicted the presence of DCIS (P = .0006). Our study suggests that micropapillary histologic subtype and extent of ADH in CNB specimens can be applied to predict the presence of DCIS on surgical excision. By using the combination of the extent of ADH in CNB specimens (1 or 2 foci), the presence of microcalcifications within the lesion, and the lack of residual mammographic calcifications after CNB, we identified a low-risk group of patients (n = 25), none of whom had carcinoma on surgical excision. Patients with ADH restricted to fewer than 3 foci may not need surgical excision, especially when the mammographic abnormality is completely removed by CNB.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 121
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[21]   Nonmalignant lesions in breast core needle biopsies - To excise or not to excise? [J].
Jacobs, TW ;
Connolly, JL ;
Schnitt, SJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2002, 26 (09) :1095-1110
[22]  
LENNINGTON WJ, 1994, CANCER, V73, P118, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940101)73:1<118::AID-CNCR2820730121>3.0.CO
[23]  
2-R
[24]   ATYPICAL DUCTAL HYPERPLASIA DIAGNOSED AT STEREOTAXIC CORE BIOPSY OF BREAST-LESIONS - AN INDICATION FOR SURGICAL BIOPSY [J].
LIBERMAN, L ;
COHEN, MA ;
DERSHAW, DD ;
ABRAMSON, AF ;
HANN, LE ;
ROSEN, PP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 164 (05) :1111-1113
[25]   To excise or to sample the mammographic target: What is the goal of stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy? [J].
Liberman, L ;
Kaplan, JB ;
Morris, EA ;
Abramson, AF ;
Menell, JH ;
Dershaw, DD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (03) :679-683
[26]   Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy [J].
Liberman, L ;
Smolkin, JH ;
Dershaw, DD ;
Morris, EA ;
Abramson, AF ;
Rosen, PP .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 208 (01) :251-260
[27]   Association of breast cancer with the finding of atypical ductal hyperplasia at core breast biopsy [J].
Moore, MM ;
Hargett, CW ;
Hanks, JB ;
Fajardo, LL ;
Harvey, JA ;
Frierson, HF ;
Slingluff, CL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1997, 225 (06) :726-731
[28]   Mild ductal atypia after large-core needle biopsy of the breast: Is surgical excision always necessary? [J].
O'Hea, BJ ;
Tornos, C .
SURGERY, 2000, 128 (04) :738-741
[29]  
PAGE DL, 1985, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V55, P2698, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19850601)55:11<2698::AID-CNCR2820551127>3.0.CO
[30]  
2-A