Characterizing agricultural impacts of recent large-scale US droughts and changing technology and management

被引:25
作者
Elliott, Joshua [1 ,2 ]
Glotter, Michael [3 ]
Ruane, Alex C. [4 ]
Boote, Kenneth J. [5 ]
Hatfield, Jerry L. [6 ]
Jones, James W. [5 ]
Rosenzweig, Cynthia [4 ]
Smith, Leonard A. [7 ]
Foster, Ian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Computat Inst, 5735 S Ellis Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Argonne Natl Lab, 9700 S Cass Ave, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Dept Geophys Sci, 5734 S Ellis Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] NASA, Goddard Inst Space Studies, 2880 Broadway, New York, NY 10025 USA
[5] Univ Florida, Agr & Biol Engn Dept, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[6] USDA ARS, Natl Lab Agr & Environm, 1015 N Univ Blvd, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[7] London Sch Econ, Ctr Anal Time Series, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, England
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Climate extremes; Drought impacts; Agriculture; Seasonal prediction; Adaptation; CERES-MAIZE MODEL; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2017.07.012
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Process-based agricultural models, applied in novel ways, can reproduce historical crop yield anomalies in the US, with median absolute deviation from observations of 6.7% at national-level and 11% at state-level. In seasons for which drought is the overriding factor, performance is further improved. Historical counterfactual scenarios for the 1988 and 2012 droughts show that changes in agricultural technologies and management have reduced system-level drought sensitivity in US maize production by about 25% in the intervening years. Finally, we estimate the economic costs of the two droughts in terms of insured and uninsured crop losses in each US county (for a total, adjusted for inflation, of $9 billion in 1988 and $21.6 billion in 2012). We compare these with cost estimates from the counterfactual scenarios and with crop indemnity data where available. Model based measures are capable of accurately reproducing the direct agro-economic losses associated with extreme drought and can be used to characterize and compare events that occurred under very different conditions. This work suggests new approaches to modeling, monitoring, forecasting, and evaluating drought impacts on agriculture, as well as evaluating technological changes to inform adaptation strategies for future climate change and extreme events.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 281
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], BILL DOLL WEATH CLIM
  • [2] Evaluation of two evapotranspiration approaches simulated with the CSM-CERES-Maize model under different irrigation strategies and the impact on maize growth, development and soil moisture content for semi-arid conditions
    Anothai, J.
    Soler, C. M. T.
    Green, A.
    Trout, T. J.
    Hoogenboom, G.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2013, 176 : 64 - 76
  • [3] Branch The Statistical MethodsThe Statistical Methods, 2012, YIELD FORECASTING PR
  • [4] Brewer M.M., 2012, US DROUGHT MONITOR
  • [5] Drought under global warming: a review
    Dai, Aiguo
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2011, 2 (01) : 45 - 65
  • [6] DUPISANI AI, 1987, WATER SA, V13, P159
  • [7] Dzotsi K.A.K.A., 2013, INT J CLIMATOL
  • [8] Echarte L., 2013, AGR CHEM
  • [9] Comparison of CERES, WOFOST and SWAP models in simulating soil water content during growing season under different soil conditions
    Eitzinger, J
    Trnka, M
    Hösch, J
    Zalud, Z
    Dubrovsky, M
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2004, 171 (03) : 223 - 246
  • [10] Elliott J.J., 2013, C EXTR SCI ENG DISC, P1