Dynamic specification of open agent systems

被引:24
作者
Artikis, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Sci Res Demokritos, Inst Informat & Telecommun, Athens 15310, Greece
关键词
norm; norm change; norm-governed system; executable specification; organized adaptation; EXECUTABLE SPECIFICATION; MULTIAGENT; COMMUNICATION; MODEL; COORDINATION; INSTITUTIONS; SEMANTICS; REVISION; LANGUAGE; LOGIC;
D O I
10.1093/logcom/exr018
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) where the agents are developed by different parties and serve different interests, are often classified as 'open'. The specification of open MAS is largely seen as a design-time activity. Moreover, there is no support for run-time specification modification. Due to environmental, social or other conditions, however, it is often required to revise the MAS specification during its execution. To address this requirement, we present an infrastructure for 'dynamic' open MAS specifications, that is, specifications that may be modified at run-time by the agents. We adopt a bird's eye view of an open MAS, as opposed to an agent's own perspective whereby it reasons about how it should act. The infrastructure consists of well-defined procedures for proposing a modification of the 'rules of the game', as well as decision-making over and enactment of proposed modifications. We evaluate proposals for rule modification by modelling a dynamic specification as a metric space, and by considering the effects of accepting a proposal on system utility. Furthermore, we constrain the enactment of proposals that do not meet the evaluation criteria. We employ the action language C+ to formalize dynamic specifications, and the 'Causal Calculator' implementation of C+ to execute the specifications. We illustrate our infrastructure by presenting a dynamic specification of a resource-sharing protocol.
引用
收藏
页码:1301 / 1334
页数:34
相关论文
共 87 条
[71]  
Rubino R., 2008, LECT NOTES COMPUTER, V4884
[72]  
Searle John R., 1996, PHILOS LANGUAGE, P130
[73]   In Vivo Evolution of Policies that Govern a Distributed System [J].
Serban, Constantin ;
Minsky, Naftaly .
2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON POLICIES FOR DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS, 2009, :134-141
[74]   Modelling unreliable and untrustworthy agent behaviour [J].
Sergot, M .
MONITORING, SECURITY, AND RESCUE TECHNIQUES IN MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS, 2005, :161-177
[75]  
Sergot M., 2004, 20048 IMP COLL LOND
[76]   On the emergence of social conventions: Modeling, analysis, and simulations [J].
Shoham, Y ;
Tennenholtz, M .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1997, 94 (1-2) :139-166
[77]   An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems: [J].
Munindar P. Singh .
Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1999, 7 (1) :97-113
[78]  
Singh MP, 2000, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V1916, P31
[79]   Agent communication languages: Rethinking the principles [J].
Singh, MP .
COMPUTER, 1998, 31 (12) :40-+
[80]   Credits and debits on the Internet [J].
Sirbu, MA .
IEEE SPECTRUM, 1997, 34 (02) :23-&