Proteases and metastasis: clinical relevance nowadays?

被引:31
作者
Decock, J
Paridaens, R
Cufer, T
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Expt Oncol Lab, Dept Gen Med Oncol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Multidisciplinary Breast Ctr, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Inst Oncol, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
predictive value; prognostic value; proteases;
D O I
10.1097/01.cco.0000180435.39614.63
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose of review A great deal of breast cancer research has been devoted to the search for new prognostic and predictive markers which could, on the one hand, enable a more precise identification of patients at high risk of recurrence and, on the other hand, predict the response of each individual patient to the administered therapy. Proteases have been the center of interest because of their prominent involvement in cancer progression and metastasis. In particular, the matrix metalloproteinases, the serine protease urokinase plasminogen activator, the cathepsins, and corresponding inhibitors have been studied extensively. This article reviews the developments during the last year in this field. Recent findings The prognostic effect of urokinase plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 was confirmed in a meta-analysis and in a prospective randomized clinical study that provided level 1 evidence for the clinical value of these markers. Furthermore, encouraging data suggest that both urokinase plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 might be important predictive markers. To date, findings on the prognostic and predictive value of the matrix metalloproteinases, the cathepsins, and their inhibitors are still inconclusive. Summary On the basis of currently available data, tumor urokinase plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 levels could already be used in everyday clinical practice for selection of candidates for adjuvant systemic therapy. Further effort should be put into the standardization of the matrix metalloproteinases and cathepsins determination so that their clinical relevance in breast cancer can be defined.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 550
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Cufer T, 2004, RADIOL ONCOL, V38, P85
  • [2] Urokinase-type plasminogen activator system in breast cancer:: Association with tamoxifen therapy in recurrent disease
    Gelder, MEV
    Look, MP
    Peters, HA
    Schmitt, M
    Brünner, N
    Harbeck, N
    Klijn, JGM
    Foekens, JA
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 64 (13) : 4563 - 4568
  • [3] Genetic polymorphisms in the MMP-2 and MMP-9 genes and breast cancer phenotype
    Grieu, F
    Li, WQ
    Iacopetta, B
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2004, 88 (03) : 197 - 204
  • [4] Harbeck N, 2001, CLIN CANCER RES, V7, P2757
  • [5] Jagodic M, 2005, NEOPLASMA, V52, P1
  • [6] Korkolis DP, 2004, ANTICANCER RES, V24, P2061
  • [7] Prognostic markers in node-negative breast cancer: A prospective study
    Kute, TE
    Russell, GB
    Zbieranski, N
    Long, R
    Johnston, S
    Williams, H
    Stackhouse, C
    Wilkins, L
    Evans, I
    Berry, P
    Rimmer, K
    Tucker, E
    [J]. CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY, 2004, 59B (01): : 24 - 31
  • [8] Prognostic value of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) in patients with lymph node-negative breast carcinoma
    Li, HC
    Cao, DC
    Liu, Y
    Hou, YF
    Wu, J
    Lu, JS
    Di, GH
    Liu, G
    Li, FM
    Ou, ZL
    Jie, C
    Shen, ZZ
    Shao, ZM
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2004, 88 (01) : 75 - 85
  • [9] Complex of urokinase-type plasminogen activator with its type 1 inhibitor predicts poor outcome in 576 patients with lymph node-negative breast carcinoma
    Manders, P
    Tjan-Heijnen, VCG
    Span, PN
    Grebenchtchikov, N
    Geurts-Moespot, A
    van Tienoven, DTH
    Beex, LVAM
    Sweep, FCGJ
    [J]. CANCER, 2004, 101 (03) : 486 - 494
  • [10] Expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9 in breast cancer with special reference to activator protein-2, HER2, and prognosis
    Pellikainen, JM
    Ropponen, KM
    Kataja, VV
    Kellokoski, JK
    Eskelinen, MJ
    Kosma, VM
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 10 (22) : 7621 - 7628