Personality characteristics and state mood influence individual deck selections on the Iowa Gambling Task

被引:64
作者
Buelow, Melissa T. [1 ]
Suhr, Julie A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Newark, OH 43055 USA
[2] Ohio Univ, Dept Psychol, Athens, OH 45701 USA
关键词
Iowa Gambling Task; IGT; State mood; Personality; BIS/BAS; PANAS; Impulsivity; DECISION-MAKING; FUTURE CONSEQUENCES; RISK-TAKING; IMPULSIVITY; INSENSITIVITY; ADOLESCENTS; PERFORMANCE; INHIBITION; PUNISHMENT; IMPLICIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.019
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is commonly used to assess risky decision making in clinical and non-clinical populations, and negative mood and various personality characteristics have been shown to affect the number of advantageous and disadvantageous selections on this task. Recent research has suggested that IGT data should be analyzed at the individual deck level due to differences in frequency and magnitude of losses, and the present study examined how personality characteristics and state mood may affect deck level selections on this task. Participants were 91 undergraduate students (38 male) who completed measures of impulsivity and sensation seeking, behavioral activation and inhibition, state mood, and the computerized IGT. Results indicated that negative mood, drive, impulsivity, and sensation seeking were all positively correlated with Deck B selections, but negatively correlated with Deck D selections. No differences emerged in correlations between Decks A and B or Decks A and D. Results indicate that mood and personality characteristics differentially relate to selections from the individual decks on the IGT. Results have implications for the assessment of decision making, as personality and fluctuations in state-dependent mood could mimic pathological risk-taking if analysis is conducted on the combined decks. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 597
页数:5
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [21] Impulsivity is associated with behavioral decision-making deficits
    Franken, Ingmar H. A.
    van Strien, Jan W.
    Nijs, Ilse
    Muris, Peter
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2008, 158 (02) : 155 - 163
  • [22] Gray J.A., 1987, Cognitive neurochemistry
  • [23] The characteristics of decision making, potential to take risks, and personality of college students with Internet addiction
    Ko, Chih-Hung
    Hsiao, Sigmund
    Liu, Gin-Chung
    Yen, Ju-Yu
    Yang, Ming-Jen
    Yen, Cheng-Fang
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2010, 175 (1-2) : 121 - 125
  • [24] Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART)
    Lejuez, CW
    Read, JP
    Kahler, CW
    Richards, JB
    Ramsey, SE
    Stuart, GL
    Strong, DR
    Brown, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2002, 8 (02) : 75 - 84
  • [25] Is deck B a disadvantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task?
    Lin, Ching-Hung
    Chiu, Yao-Chu
    Lee, Po-Lei
    Hsieh, Jen-Chuen
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN FUNCTIONS, 2007, 3
  • [26] Gain-loss frequency and final outcome in the Soochow Gambling Task: A Reassessment
    Lin, Ching-Hung
    Chiu, Yao-Chu
    Huang, Jong-Tsun
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN FUNCTIONS, 2009, 5
  • [27] Anxiety impairs decision-making: Psychophysiological evidence from an Iowa Gambling Task
    Miu, Andrei C.
    Heilman, Renata M.
    Houser, Daniel
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 77 (03) : 353 - 358
  • [28] Sensitivity to reward and punishment and the prefrontal cortex in major depression
    Must, A
    Szabó, Z
    Bódi, N
    Szász, A
    Janka, Z
    Kéri, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2006, 90 (2-3) : 209 - 215
  • [29] Response inhibition deficit is involved in poor decision making under risk in nonamnesic individuals with alcoholism
    Noel, Xavier
    Bechara, Antoine
    Dan, Bernard
    Hanak, Catherine
    Verbanck, Paul
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 21 (06) : 778 - 786
  • [30] Reacting to perceived high- and low-risk win-lose opportunities in a risk decision-making task: Is it framing or affect or both?
    Nygren, TE
    [J]. MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 1998, 22 (01) : 73 - 98