Commissioning and validation of commercial deformable image registration software for adaptive contouring

被引:11
|
作者
Jamema, Swamidas V. [1 ]
Phurailatpam, Reena [1 ]
Paul, Siji N. [1 ]
Joshi, Kishore [1 ]
Deshpande, D. D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tata Mem Hosp, ACTREC, Dept Radiat Oncol, Navi Mumbai 410210, Maharashtra, India
[2] Tata Mem Hosp, Tata Mem Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Bombay 400012, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Validation; Deformable image registration; Commissioning; TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM; RADIATION-THERAPY; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; RADIOTHERAPY; PHANTOM; PELVIS; LEVEL; NECK; HEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.01.013
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To report the commissioning and validation of deformable image registration(DIR) software for adaptive contouring. Methods: DIR (SmartAdapt (R) v13.6) was validated using two methods namely contour propagation accuracy and landmark tracking, using physical phantoms and clinical images of various disease sites. Five in-house made phantoms with various known deformations and a set of 10 virtual phantoms were used. Displacement in lateral, anterio-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) direction were evaluated for various organs and compared with the ground truth. Four clinical sites namely, brain (n=5), HN (n=9), cervix (n=18) and prostate (n=23) were used. Organs were manually delineated by a radiation oncologist, compared with the deformable image registration (DIR) generated contours. 3D slicer v4.5.0.1 was used to analyze Dice Similarity Co-efficient (DSC), shift in centre of mass (COM) and Hausdorff distances Hf-95%/avg. Results: Mean (SD) DSC, Hf-95% (mm), Hf-avg (mm) and COM of all the phantoms 1-5 were 0.84 (0.2) mm, 5.1 (7.4) mm, 1.6 (2.2) mm, and 1.6 (0.2) mm respectively. Phantom-5 had the largest deformation as compared to phantoms 1-4, and hence had suboptimal indices. The virtual phantom resulted in consistent results for all the ROIs investigated. Contours propagated for brain patients were better with a high DSC score (0.91 (0.04)) as compared to other sites (HN: 0.84, prostate: 0.81 and cervix 0.77). A similar trend was seen in other indices too. The accuracy of propagated contours is limited for complex deformations that include large volume and shape change of bladder and rectum respectively. Visual validation of the propagated contours is recommended for clinical implementation. Conclusion: The DIR algorithm was commissioned and validated for adaptive contouring.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of a deformable registration image of a commercial treated planning system
    Garcia-Molla, R.
    Marco-Blancas, N.
    Bonaque, J.
    Viduera, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S261 - S262
  • [2] Automatic contouring via deformable image registration
    Foskey, M
    Davis, B
    Goyal, L
    Chang, S
    Rosenman, J
    Joshi, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (02): : S524 - S524
  • [3] Assessment of Adaptive Radiation Therapy With deformable Image Registration Software
    Mukumoto, N.
    Yada, R.
    Shimizu, Y.
    Okumura, K.
    Wang, T.
    Osuga, S.
    Akasaka, H.
    Aoyama, Y.
    Sasaki, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06)
  • [4] Assessment of the Quality and Accuracy of a Commercial Deformable Image Registration (DIR) Software
    Jurkovic, I.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    Stathakis, S.
    Kirby, N.
    Mavroidis, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E401 - E401
  • [5] Validation of a deformable image registration for adaptive radiotherapy of lung cancer
    Abdoli, M.
    Van Kranen, S.
    Sonke, J. J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S491 - S491
  • [6] Validation of Deformable Image Registration Software Using a Standard CT Phantom
    Verdecchia, K.
    Qiu, L.
    Magnelli, A.
    Balik, S.
    Kost, S.
    Godley, A.
    Xia, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3174 - 3175
  • [7] DIRART - a Software Suite for Deformable Image Registration and Adaptive Radiotherapy Research
    Yang, D.
    El Naqa, I.
    Apte, A.
    Wu, Y.
    Goddu, S.
    Mutic, S.
    Deasy, J.
    Low, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [8] Systematic Evaluation of a Deformable Image Registration Algorithm From a Commercial Software Package
    Stanley, N.
    Zhong, H.
    Glide-Hurst, C.
    Chetty, I.
    Movsas, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3876 - 3876
  • [9] A validation framework to assess performance of commercial deformable image registration in lung radiotherapy
    Kumar, K.
    Gulal, O.
    Franich, R. D.
    Kron, T.
    Yeo, A. U.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 87 : 106 - 114
  • [10] Evaluation of the deformable image registration algorithm in Velocity image registration software
    Fullarton, R.
    Ghirmay, K.
    Dom, W.
    Crees, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S974 - S974