Players and Purists: Networking Strategies and Agency of Service Professionals

被引:78
作者
Bensaou, Ben M. [1 ]
Galunic, Charles [2 ]
Jonczyk-Sedes, Claudia [3 ]
机构
[1] INSEAD, Technol & Operat Management Area, F-77305 Fontainebleau, France
[2] INSEAD, Org Behav Area, F-77305 Fontainebleau, France
[3] ESCP Europe, Dept Org Studies, London NW3 7BG, England
关键词
social networks; social capital; agency; network dynamics; professional service firms; qualitative methods; SOCIAL NETWORKS; PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS; INDIVIDUAL-PERFORMANCE; ADVICE NETWORKS; CAREER; MANAGERIAL; BEHAVIOR; TIES; ORGANIZATIONS; ENTREPRENEURS;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.2013.0826
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Social capital research has established the performance advantages of networking. However, we know surprisingly little about the strategies individuals employ when networking and, in particular, the underlying agency mechanisms involved. Network analysis tends to presume structural determinism and ignore issues of endogeneity rather than explore how actors draw on schemas, beliefs, and values in developing their networks. This empirical paper induces three networking strategies of newly promoted service professionals operating within two firms (AuditCo and ConsultCo) over a 16-month period. Using a grounded theory building approach, we first establish a set of core categories that capture networking behavior. We then conduct a cluster analysis revealing three distinct networking configurations or strategies: Devoted Players, Purists, and Selective Players. We also reveal the distinct agency involved in each profile and investigate the extent to which these networking strategies correlate with variables that shed light on issues of endogeneity and deepen our understanding of the strategies (including network structure and socialization progress in the players' new jobs).
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 56
页数:28
相关论文
共 94 条
[81]   Agency and social networks: Strategies of action in a social structure of position, opposition, and opportunity [J].
Stevenson, WB ;
Greenberg, D .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (04) :651-678
[82]  
Strauss E, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P2
[83]  
Stumpf S.A., 1999, Career development international, V4, P392
[84]  
Subramaniam M, 2005, ACAD MANAGE J, V48, P450, DOI 10.2307/20159670
[85]  
Tabachnick BG., 2019, Using multivariate statistics, V7
[86]   Reciprocity in manager-subordinate relationships: Components, configurations, and outcomes [J].
Uhl-Bien, M ;
Maslyn, JM .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2003, 29 (04) :511-532
[87]   Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness [J].
Uzzi, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1997, 42 (01) :35-67
[88]  
Vissa B, 2006, ACAD MANAGEMENT P S, pG1
[89]   Agency in Action: Entrepreneurs' Networking Style and Initiation of Economic Exchange [J].
Vissa, Balagopal .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (02) :492-510
[90]  
WHITE HC, 1992, NETWORKS AND ORGANIZATIONS : STRUCTURE, FORM, AND ACTION, P92