Influence of crosshead speed on micro-tensile bond strength of two-step adhesive systems

被引:20
作者
Yamaguchi, K
Miyazaki, M
Takamizawa, T
Tsubota, K
Rikuta, A
机构
[1] Nihon Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Operat Dent, Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo 1018310, Japan
[2] Nihon Univ, Grad Sch Dent, Tokyo, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
adhesion; composite; crosshead speed; dentin; micro-tensile bond strength;
D O I
10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.031
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of crosshead speed on the micro-tensile bond strength of two separate adhesive systems to dentin. Methods. The systems used were the Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray Medical) and the Single Bond (3M ESPE) combined with a resin composite Clearfil AP-X (Kuraray Medical). Dentin surfaces of bovine madibular incisors were primed with self-etching primer followed by air blowing for Clearfil SE Bond, or etched with phosphoric acid followed by rinsing with distilled water for Single Bond, and adhesive was applied. The resin composite was then built up in three layers and light activated. After 24 h storage in water, specimens were sectioned and trimmed to a cross-sectional area of 1 mm(2) and subjected to a micro-tensile bond-strength test. Ten samples per test group were tested at crosshead speeds of 0.5, 1.0, 5.0 and 10.0 mm/min. Microtensile bond-strength values (in MPa) were calculated from the peak load at failure divided by the specimen surface area. Two-way ANOVA was performed at the 0.05 probability level. Results. The mean dentin bond strength at different crosshead speeds ranged from 34.6 to 37.1 MPa for Clearfil SE Bond and from 44.3 to 50.4 MPa for Single Bond. There was no significant difference among the same adhesive systems with the different crosshead speeds tested. Significance. The influence of the crosshead speed might be negligible when measuring micro-tensile bond strengths. (C) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Academy of Dental Materials.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 425
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]  
Schilke R, 1999, AM J DENT, V12, P92
[22]   CORRELATION OF INVIVO AND INVITRO PERFORMANCE OF ADHESIVE RESTORATIVE MATERIALS - A REPORT OF THE ASC MD156 TASK GROUP ON TEST METHODS FOR THE ADHESION OF RESTORATIVE MATERIALS [J].
SODERHOLM, KJM .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1991, 7 (02) :74-83
[23]  
Sudsangiam S, 1999, J Adhes Dent, V1, P57
[24]  
Tay FR, 2003, J ADHES DENT, V5, P91
[25]  
Van Meerbeek B, 2003, OPER DENT, V28, P215
[26]   ASSESSMENT BY NANO-INDENTATION OF THE HARDNESS AND ELASTICITY OF THE RESIN-DENTIN BONDING AREA [J].
VANMEERBEEK, B ;
WILLEMS, G ;
CELIS, JP ;
ROOS, JR ;
BRAEM, M ;
LAMBRECHTS, P ;
VANHERLE, G .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1993, 72 (10) :1434-1442
[27]   THE EFFECT OF LOCAL INTERFACIAL GEOMETRY ON THE MEASUREMENT OF THE TENSILE BOND STRENGTH TO DENTIN [J].
VANNOORT, R ;
CARDEW, GE ;
HOWARD, IC ;
NOROOZI, S .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1991, 70 (05) :889-893
[28]   A CRITIQUE OF BOND STRENGTH MEASUREMENTS [J].
VANNOORT, R ;
NOROOZI, S ;
HOWARD, IC ;
CARDEW, G .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1989, 17 (02) :61-67
[29]   Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? [J].
Versluis, A ;
Tantbirojn, D ;
Douglas, WH .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 76 (06) :1298-1307
[30]  
Wakasa K, 1995, Dent Mater J, V14, P152