Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Radiation Therapy Outcomes: A Clinician's Perspective

被引:128
作者
Kang, John [1 ]
Schwartz, Russell [2 ]
Flickinger, John [3 ,4 ]
Beriwal, Sushil [3 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Univ Pittsburgh, Med Scientist Training Program, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Neurol Surg, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2015年 / 93卷 / 05期
关键词
ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; RADIOTHERAPY OUTCOMES; TUMOR-CONTROL; DOSE-VOLUME; NTCP MODELS; PNEUMONITIS; CANCER; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.2286
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Radiation oncology has always been deeply rooted in modeling, from the early days of isoeffect curves to the contemporary Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) initiative. In recent years, medical modeling for both prognostic and therapeutic purposes has exploded thanks to increasing availability of electronic data and genomics. One promising direction that medical modeling is moving toward is adopting the same machine learning methods used by companies such as Google and Facebook to combat disease. Broadly defined, machine learning is a branch of computer science that deals with making predictions from complex data through statistical models. These methods serve to uncover patterns in data and are actively used in areas such as speech recognition, handwriting recognition, face recognition, "spam" filtering (junk email), and targeted advertising. Although multiple radiation oncology research groups have shown the value of applied machine learning (ML), clinical adoption has been slow due to the high barrier to understanding these complex models by clinicians. Here, we present a review of the use of ML to predict radiation therapy outcomes from the clinician's point of view with the hope that it lowers the "barrier to entry" for those without formal training in ML. We begin by describing 7 principles that one should consider when evaluating (or creating) an ML model in radiation oncology. We next introduce 3 popular ML methods-logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN)-and critique 3 seminal papers in the context of these principles. Although current studies are in exploratory stages, the overall methodology has progressively matured, and the field is ready for larger-scale further investigation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1127 / 1135
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], CANC LETT
  • [2] External validation of three dimensional conformal radiotherapy based NTCP models for patient-rated xerostomia and sticky saliva among patients treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy
    Beetz, Ivo
    Schilstra, Cornelis
    van Luijk, Peter
    Christianen, Miranda E. M. C.
    Doornaert, Patricia
    Bijl, Henk P.
    Chouvalova, Olga
    van den Heuvel, Edwin R.
    Steenbakkers, Roel J. H. M.
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 105 (01) : 94 - 100
  • [3] Learning Deep Architectures for AI
    Bengio, Yoshua
    [J]. FOUNDATIONS AND TRENDS IN MACHINE LEARNING, 2009, 2 (01): : 1 - 127
  • [4] QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES OF NORMAL TISSUE EFFECTS IN THE CLINIC (QUANTEC): AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SCIENTIFIC ISSUES
    Bentzen, Soren M.
    Constine, Louis S.
    Deasy, Joseph O.
    Eisbruch, Avi
    Jackson, Andrew
    Marks, Lawrence B.
    Ten Haken, Randall K.
    Yorke, Ellen D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (03): : S3 - S9
  • [5] Bishop C.M., 2006, Pattern recognition and machine learning, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-45528-0
  • [6] Dose-volume modeling of salivary function in patients with head-and-neck cancer receiving radiotherapy
    Blanco, AI
    Chao, KSC
    El Naqa, I
    Franklin, GE
    Zakarian, K
    Vicic, M
    Deasy, JO
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (04): : 1055 - 1069
  • [7] A nomogram to predict radiation pneumonitis, derived from a combined analysis of rtog 9311 and institutional data
    Bradley, Jeffrey D.
    Hope, Andrew
    El Naqa, Issam
    Apte, Aditya
    Lindsay, Patricia E.
    Bosch, Walter
    Matthews, John
    Sause, Wrlliam
    Graham, Mary V.
    Deasy, Joseph O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (04): : 985 - 992
  • [8] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [9] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [10] Burges CJC, 1999, NEUR INF PROC SYST N