Benefit-risk assessment for sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir based on patient population and hepatitis C virus genotype: U. S. Food and Drug Administration's evaluation

被引:24
作者
Struble, Kimberly [1 ]
Chan-Tack, Kirk [1 ]
Qi, Karen [2 ]
Naeger, Lisa K. [1 ]
Birnkrant, Debra [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Div Antiviral Prod, Off Antimicrobial Prod, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Silver Spring, MD USA
[2] US FDA, Off Biostat, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Silver Spring, MD USA
关键词
SUSTAINED VIROLOGICAL RESPONSE; ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY; SOFOSBUVIR; RETREATMENT; INFECTION; INHIBITOR; RIBAVIRIN; CIRRHOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/hep.29601
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
On July 18, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) (Vosevi) fixed-dose combination (FDC), an interferon-free, complete regimen for adult patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A) who have: center dot genotype 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 infection and have previously been treated with an HCV regimen containing a nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitor; and center dot genotype 1a or 3 infection and have previously been treated with an HCV regimen containing sofosbuvir without an NS5A inhibitor. Approval was based on an acceptable safety profile and high sustained virological response rates 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) in two phase 3 clinical trials in subjects previously treated with a direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimen. In POLARIS-1, 96% of SOF/VEL/VOX-treated subjects achieved SVR12. In POLARIS-4, 98% of SOF/VEL/VOX-treated subjects achieved SVR12. A key and challenging question in evaluating the data was determining the contribution of VOX to SOF/VEL and how this differed depending on the genotype and patient population. In this article, we provide our perspective on the issues considered in making these determinations, especially regarding the POLARIS-4 data in subjects who have previously been treated with a chronic HCV regimen containing sofosbuvir without an NS5A inhibitor. Conclusion: We seek to provide context as to why a broad indication was given for NS5A inhibitor-experienced patients (HCV genotypes 1-6) while the indication for NS5A inhibitor- naive patients was limited to HCV genotypes 1a and 3 only. (Hepatology 2018;67:482-491).
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 491
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir as salvage therapy for HCV genotype 1 failures to prior NS5A inhibitors regimens [J].
Akuta, Norio ;
Sezaki, Hitomi ;
Suzuki, Fumitaka ;
Fujiyama, Shunichiro ;
Kawamura, Yusuke ;
Hosaka, Tetsuya ;
Kobayashi, Masahiro ;
Kobayashi, Mariko ;
Saitoh, Satoshi ;
Suzuki, Yoshiyuki ;
Arase, Yasuji ;
Ikeda, Kenji ;
Kumada, Hiromitsu .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2017, 89 (07) :1248-1254
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, VOS PACK INS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, TECHN PACK INS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, OL PACK INS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, GUID IND CHRON HEP C
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, HARV PACK INS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, HEPATITIS C GUIDANCE
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017, EPCL PACK INS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 65 ANN M AM ASS STUD
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2017, VIEK PAK PACK INS