Analyzing the Spatial Distribution of PCB Concentrations in Soils Using Below-Quantification Limit Data

被引:4
|
作者
Orton, Thomas G. [1 ]
Saby, Nicolas P. A. [1 ]
Arrouays, Dominique [1 ]
Jolivet, Claudy C. [1 ]
Villanneau, Estelle J. [1 ]
Paroissien, Jean-Baptiste [1 ]
Marchant, Ben P. [2 ]
Caria, Giovanni [3 ]
Barriuso, Enrique [4 ]
Bispo, Antonio [5 ]
Briand, Olivier [6 ]
机构
[1] INRA, US InfoSol 1106, F-4075 Orleans, France
[2] Rothamsted Res, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, Herts, England
[3] INRA, Lab Anal Sols, US0010, F-62000 Arras, France
[4] INRA AgroParisTech, UMR1091, F-78850 Thiverval Grignon, France
[5] ADEME Waste & Soil Res Dept, F-49004 Angers 01, France
[6] ANSES, Lab Food Safety, F-94706 Maisons Alfort, France
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
POLYCHLORINATED-BIPHENYLS PCBS; PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; CENSORED-DATA; PREDICTION; FRANCE; CONTAMINATION; SEDIMENTS; MODELS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2134/jeq2011.0478
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are highly toxic environmental pollutants that can accumulate in soils. We consider the problem of explaining and mapping the spatial distribution of PCBs using a spatial data set of 105 PCB-187 measurements from a region in the north of France. A large proportion of our data (35%) fell below a quantification limit (QL), meaning that their concentrations could not be determined to a sufficient degree of precision. Where a measurement fell below this QL, the inequality information was all that we were presented with. In this work, we demonstrate a full geostatistical analysis-bringing together the various components, including model selection, cross-validation, and mapping using censored data to represent the uncertainty that results from below-QL observations. We implement a Monte Carlo maximum likelihood approach to estimate the geostatistical model parameters. To select the best set of explanatory variables for explaining and mapping the spatial distribution of PCB-187 concentrations, we apply the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The AIC provides a trade-off between the goodness-of-fit of a model and its complexity (i.e., the number of covariates). We then use the best set of explanatory variables to help interpolate the measurements via a Bayesian approach, and produce maps of the predictions. We calculate predictions of the probability of exceeding a concentration threshold, above which the land could be considered as contaminated. The work demonstrates some differences between approaches based on censored data and on imputed data (in which the below-QL data are replaced by a value of half of the QL). Cross-validation results demonstrate better predictions based on the censored data approach, and we should therefore have confidence in the information provided by predictions from this method.
引用
收藏
页码:1893 / 1905
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spatial and temporal distribution of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) concentrations in soils of an industrialized city in Turkey
    Salihoglu, Guray
    Salihoglu, N. Kamil
    Aksoy, Ertugrul
    Tasdemir, Yucel
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 92 (03) : 724 - 732
  • [2] Likelihood based approaches to handling data below the quantification limit using NONMEM VI
    Jae Eun Ahn
    Mats O. Karlsson
    Adrian Dunne
    Thomas M. Ludden
    Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, 2008, 35 : 401 - 421
  • [3] Likelihood based approaches to handling data below the quantification limit using NONMEM VI
    Ahn, Jae Eun
    Karlsson, Mats O.
    Dunne, Adrian
    Ludden, Thomas M.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2008, 35 (04) : 401 - 421
  • [4] Handling Data Below the Limit of Quantification in Mixed Effect Models
    Martin Bergstrand
    Mats O. Karlsson
    The AAPS Journal, 2009, 11 : 371 - 380
  • [5] Handling Data Below the Limit of Quantification in Mixed Effect Models
    Bergstrand, Martin
    Karlsson, Mats O.
    AAPS JOURNAL, 2009, 11 (02): : 371 - 380
  • [6] Evaluation of pharmacokinetic studies: Is it useful to take into account concentrations below the limit of quantification?
    Humbert, H
    Cabiac, MD
    Barradas, J
    Gerbeau, C
    PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 1996, 13 (06) : 839 - 845
  • [7] Erratum to: Likelihood based approaches to handling data below the quantification limit using NONMEM VI
    Jae Eun Ahn
    Mats O. Karlsson
    Adrian Dunne
    Thomas M. Ludden
    Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, 2010, 37 : 305 - 308
  • [8] Ways to fit a PK model with some data below the quantification limit
    Beal, SL
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2001, 28 (05) : 481 - 504
  • [9] Incorporation of concentration data below the limit of quantification in population pharmacokinetic analyses
    Keizer, Ron J.
    Jansen, Robert S.
    Rosing, Hilde
    Thijssen, Bas
    Beijnen, Jos H.
    Schellens, Jan H. M.
    Huitema, Alwin D. R.
    PHARMACOLOGY RESEARCH & PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 3 (02): : 1 - 15
  • [10] Ways to Fit a PK Model with Some Data Below the Quantification Limit
    Stuart L. Beal
    Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, 2001, 28 : 481 - 504