Seismic demand of plan-asymmetric structures: a revisit

被引:16
|
作者
Roy, Rana [1 ]
Chakroborty, Suvonkar [1 ]
机构
[1] Bengal Engn & Sci Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn & Appl Mech, Sibpur, India
关键词
asymmetry; seismic; strength dependent stiffness; design chart; STRENGTH DISTRIBUTION; TORSIONAL RESPONSE; CODE PROVISIONS; DESIGN; BUILDINGS; BEHAVIOR; SYSTEMS; PRINCIPLES; ELEMENTS; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s11803-013-0155-3
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In view of the recognition of the importance of the interdependent behavior of strength and stiffness of walltype structural elements, the seismic demand of plan-asymmetric systems is revisited. Useful strength distribution strategies, i.e., 'Center of Strength-Center of Mass (CV-CM) coinciding' and 'Balanced Center of Strength-Center of Resistance (CVCR)' are adopted. Design charts for the seismic demand of classical uni-directionally and bi-directionally asymmetric systems are developed in a simple unified format. A conceptual framework is also outlined to conveniently apply the design charts. Illustrations are included to explain the use of the current recommendations in practical design. The study also highlights the relative performance of 'CV-CM coinciding' and 'Balanced CV-CR' criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 117
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Seismic demand of plan-asymmetric structures: a revisit
    Rana Roy
    Suvonkar Chakroborty
    Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2013, 12 : 99 - 117
  • [2] Seismic demand of plan-asymmetric structures:a revisit
    Rana Roy
    Suvonkar Chakroborty
    Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2013, 12 (01) : 99 - 117
  • [3] Seismic Response of Plan-Asymmetric Structures with Diaphragm Flexibility
    Eivani, Hamed
    Moghadam, Abdolreza S.
    Aziminejad, Armin
    Nekooei, Masoud
    SHOCK AND VIBRATION, 2018, 2018
  • [4] Scaling of ground motions and its implications to plan-asymmetric structures
    Roy, Rana
    Thakur, Pawan
    Chakroborty, Suvonkar
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2014, 57 : 46 - 67
  • [5] The role of overstrength on the seismic performance of asymmetric-plan structures
    Kaatsiz, Kaan
    Sucuoglu, Haluk
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2019, 48 (04) : 412 - 431
  • [6] Approximate Methods for Estimating Hysteretic Energy Demand on Plan-Asymmetric Buildings
    Rathore, Manish
    Chowdhury, Amarnath Roy
    Ghosh, Siddhartha
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2011, 15 (01) : 99 - 123
  • [7] A new simplified approach for assessing nonlinear seismic response of plan-asymmetric structures considering soil-structure interaction
    Birzhandi, Mohammad S.
    Halabian, Amir M.
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 16 (12) : 6013 - 6046
  • [8] A Comparative Study of Seismic Performance of Steel Framed Buildings with Varied Plan-Asymmetric Properties
    Lin, Jui-Liang
    Chow, Te-Kuang
    Li, Chao-Hsien
    Yeh, Yeong-Kae
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI, 2021, 15 (04)
  • [9] The Effect of Foundation Flexibility on Probabilistic Seismic Performance of Plan-Asymmetric Buildings with Different Strength Distributions
    Osalu, Sahar Mohammadzadeh
    Shakib, Hamzeh
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
  • [10] Effective Assessment of Inelastic Torsional Deformation of Plan-Asymmetric Shear Wall Systems
    Ha, Taehyu
    Hong, Sung-Gul
    Cho, Bong-Ho
    Kim, Dae-Jin
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (14):