Empirical observations on longer-term use of incentives for weight loss

被引:28
作者
John, Leslie K. [1 ]
Loewenstein, George [3 ]
Volpp, Kevin G. [2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Business, Mkt Unit, Boston, MA 02163 USA
[2] Philadelphia Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Hlth Equ Res & Promot, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[4] Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Ctr Hlth Incent, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Penn Wharton Sch, Dept Hlth Care Management, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Weight loss; Obesity; Behavioral economics; Intervention;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.01.022
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Behavioral economic-based interventions are emerging as powerful tools to help individuals accomplish their own goals, including weight loss. Deposit contract incentive systems give participants the opportunity to put their money down toward losing weight, which they forfeit if they fail to lose weight; lottery incentive systems enable participants to win money if they attain weight loss goals. In this paper, we pool data from two prior studies to examine a variety of issues that unpublished data from those studies allow us to address. First, examining data from the deposit contract treatments in greater depth, we investigate factors affecting deposit frequency and size, and discuss possible ways of increasing deposits. Next, we compare the effectiveness of both deposit contract and lottery interventions as a function of participant demographic characteristics. These observations may help to guide the design of future, longer-term, behavioral economic-based interventions. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S68 / S74
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.032
[2]   COSTS AND BENEFITS OF JUDGMENT ERRORS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DEBIASING [J].
ARKES, HR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (03) :486-498
[4]   Time discounting and time preference: A critical review [J].
Frederick, S ;
Loewenstein, G ;
O'Donoghue, T .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2002, 40 (02) :351-401
[5]   Pennies-a-day: The effect of temporal reframing on transaction evaluation [J].
Gourville, JT .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1998, 24 (04) :395-408
[6]   Financial Incentives for Extended Weight Loss: A Randomized, Controlled Trial [J].
John, Leslie K. ;
Loewenstein, George ;
Troxel, Andrea B. ;
Norton, Laurie ;
Fassbender, Jennifer E. ;
Volpp, Kevin G. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 26 (06) :621-626
[7]  
Johnson E, 2003, SCIENCE, V302
[8]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[9]   A structured review of the effect of economic incentives on consumers' preventive behavior [J].
Kane, RL ;
Johnson, PE ;
Town, RJ ;
Butler, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 27 (04) :327-352
[10]   The Law, Policy, and Ethics of Employers' Use of Financial Incentives to Improve Health [J].
Madison, Kristin M. ;
Volpp, Kevin G. ;
Halpern, Scott D. .
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2011, 39 (03) :450-468