Lessons from the Use of an Active Production Well for Compliance Monitoring in the Great Artesian Basin, Australia

被引:0
|
作者
Bekesi, Gabor [1 ]
Tyler, Murray [2 ]
Waterhouse, John [3 ]
机构
[1] Australian Water Environm, Eastwood, SA 5063, Australia
[2] BHP Billiton, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[3] Golder Associates, Perth, WA 6005, Australia
关键词
Great Artesian Basin; Australia; Groundwater head; Pressure; Drawdown;
D O I
10.1007/s10230-012-0183-7
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Wellfield B, in the Great Artesian Basin (GAB), supplies 30 ML/day of fresh groundwater to BHP Billiton's Olympic Dam mine and the town of Roxby Downs in South Australia. Groundwater use from Wellfield B is regulated according to the regional effects on pressures in the aquifer. Drawdown assessment criteria (allowing a maximum of 5 m as pressure drawdown measured in piezometers) were set at five sites, including two active pastoral production wells that existed prior to the commissioning of Wellfield B. Aquifer pressure in these production wells was measured after a predetermined recovery time. Pastoral flow was eliminated in 2009/10 in one of the wells, providing an opportunity to assess whether antecedent flow had affected the measured pressures and therefore the reported apparent drawdown. In the GAB, the combination of deep wells, high pressures, and hot water make flow and pressure measurements and the calculation of head more challenging than in cold aquifers. Pressures measured at the well head often decrease during recovery, and the influence of temperature has to be incorporated in head calculations. Based on one example, Jackboot Bore, it is clear that recovery times in the order of months are required, which is impractical. Hence, the use of an active production well for assessing compliance with drawdown criteria is not recommended in the GAB.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 232
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hydrogeological implications of active tectonics in the Great Artesian Basin, Australia
    Sandiford, Mike
    Lawrie, Ken
    Brodie, Ross S.
    HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 28 (01) : 57 - 73
  • [2] Great Artesian Basin in Australia.
    Forkasiewicz, Janina
    Bulletin du Bureau de recherches geologiques et minieres. Section 3, Hydrogeologie, 1982, (02): : 197 - 212
  • [3] GEOCHEMISTRY OF GROUND WATERS FROM THE GREAT ARTESIAN BASIN, AUSTRALIA
    HERCZEG, AL
    TORGERSEN, T
    CHIVAS, AR
    HABERMEHL, MA
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1991, 126 (3-4) : 225 - 245
  • [4] Thermal convection in the Great Artesian Basin, Australia
    Pestov, I
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2000, 14 (05) : 391 - 403
  • [5] Thermal Convection in the Great Artesian Basin, Australia
    Irene Pestov
    Water Resources Management, 2000, 14 : 391 - 403
  • [6] Spring wetlands of the Great Artesian Basin, Queensland, Australia
    Fensham, R. J.
    Fairfax, R. J.
    WETLANDS ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 11 (05) : 343 - 362
  • [7] Spring wetlands of the Great Artesian Basin, Queensland, Australia
    R.J. Fensham
    R.J. Fairfax
    Wetlands Ecology and Management, 2003, 11 : 343 - 362
  • [8] Pilliga Sandstone hydrogeochemistry, Great Artesian Basin, Australia
    Wolfgang, CA
    White, I
    GROUNDWATER: PAST ACHIEVEMENTS AND FUTURE CHALLENGES, 2000, : 683 - 687
  • [9] Monitoring temporal dynamics of Great Artesian Basin wetland vegetation, Australia, using MODIS NDVI
    Petus, Caroline
    Lewis, Megan
    White, Davina
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 34 : 41 - 52
  • [10] The contribution of citizen science in managing and monitoring groundwater systems impacted by coal seam gas production: an example from the Surat Basin in Australia's Great Artesian Basin
    Jamieson, Michael
    Elson, Mabbie
    Carruthers, Ross
    Ordens, Carlos Miraldo
    HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 28 (01) : 439 - 459