Morphometric description and genetic diversity in 208 monoecious and pistillate castor (Ricinus communis L.) germplasms/genotypes: an unexplored industrial oil crop in semi-arid tropics

被引:3
作者
Deepika, C. [1 ]
Venkatachalam, S. R. [1 ]
Yuvaraja, A. [1 ]
Arutchenthil, P. [2 ]
Indra, N. [3 ]
Ravichandran, V [1 ]
Veeramani, P. [1 ]
Kathirvelan, P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Tapioca & Castor Res Stn, Salem 636119, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Hort Coll & Res Inst Women, Dept Genet & Plant Breeding, Trichy 620027, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Forest Coll & Res Inst, Dept Plant Pathol, Mettupalayam 641301, Tamil Nadu, India
[4] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Agr Coll & Res Inst, Dept Agron, Coimbatore 641003, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Castor; K means clustering; Morphological description; Principal component analysis; Seed yield; JATROPHA-CURCAS; ACCESSIONS; RESISTANCE; RESOURCES; GERMPLASM; SELECTION; YIELD; PATH;
D O I
10.1007/s10681-022-03115-8
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
It is axiomatic that castor (Ricinus communis L.) is an industrially important oil crop with wide use. Though it is possible to augment oil yield by selecting appropriate parental lines, seed yield of the parents should also be given due weightage to meet out the increasing oil demand. Hence, it is imperative to improve the seed yield by breeding elite hybrids/varieties. Morphological description of 208 castor genotypic population for eight qualitative traits was carried out and considerable polymorphism existed among the collection. Maximum genotypes were R2 and R3 morphotypes because of the dominant nature of red stem color and blooming nature. K means clustering separated the genotypes into 20 clusters with cluster 4 and 20 as well separated ones. Cluster 4 could serve as female parent since the cluster was composed of pistillate lines and cluster 20 as male parent during hybridization. Path coefficient analysis supported the correlation coefficient that effective spike length and capsule weight showed high positive direct effects with seed yield. Also, the analysis revealed primary spike length and effective length of primary spike as the variables with the largest weightage. The first four components accounted for 75.95% of the variation cumulatively. The components were rotated with varimax rotation and the variability contribution was similar to the normal (76%). High communality values specified the reliability of the studied variables in explaining the total variation. Considering both cluster analysis and PCA, the genotypes SKP 84, DPC 19, JP 65, JC 3, JC 26, RG 27, ICS 210 and RG 3477 possessed superior agronomic performance. Hence, these genotypes/germplasms had immense value as parents in breeding varieties/hybrids to meet out the global oil demand.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Agyenim-Boateng K.G., 2018, Genet. Genom. Sci, V3, P1, DOI [10.24966/ggs-2485/100009, DOI 10.24966/GGS-2485/100009]
[2]   Trait-specific accessions in global castor (Ricinus communis L.) germplasm core set for utilization in castor improvement [J].
Anjani, K. ;
Raoof, M. A. ;
Prasad, M. Santha Lakshmi ;
Duraimurugan, P. ;
Lucose, C. ;
Yadav, Praduman ;
Prasad, R. D. ;
Lal, J. Jawahar ;
Sarada, C. .
INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2018, 112 :766-774
[3]   Evaluation of world castor (Ricinus communis L.) germplasm for resistance to Fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp ricini) [J].
Anjani, K. ;
Raoof, M. A. ;
Desai, A. G. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2014, 139 (03) :567-578
[4]   Castor genetic resources: A primary gene pool for exploitation [J].
Anjani, K. .
INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2012, 35 (01) :1-14
[5]   Extra-early maturing germplasm for utilization in castor improvement [J].
Anjani, K. .
INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2010, 31 (01) :139-144
[6]  
Anjani K, 2000, CATALOGUE CASTOR, P1
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, INDIASTAT
[8]  
Bagali S., 2010, Leornard. J. Sci, V17, P1
[9]  
Beebe KR, 1998, Chemometrics: A Practical Guide
[10]   CORRELATIONS AND PATH-ANALYSIS IN CASTOR (RICINUS-COMMUNIS) [J].
BHATT, D ;
REDDY, TP .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND CYTOLOGY, 1981, 23 (03) :525-531