The effectiveness of assertive community treatment for elderly patients with severe mental illness: a randomized controlled trial

被引:13
作者
Stobbe, Jolanda [1 ,2 ]
Wierdsma, Andre I. [1 ]
Kok, Rob M. [3 ]
Kroon, Hans [4 ]
Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan [1 ,2 ]
Depla, Marja [5 ]
Mulder, Cornelis L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Psychiat, Epidemiol & Social Psychiat Res Inst, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Ctr Mental Hlth Care, Dept BavoEuropoort, Parnassia Psychiat Inst, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Ctr Mental Hlth Care, Dept Parnassia, Parnassia Psychiat Inst, The Hague, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Inst Mental Hlth & Addict, Trimbos Inst, Utrecht, Da Costakade, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Dept Gen Practice & Elderly Care Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Assertive community treatment; Severe mental illness; Dropout; Elderly; HoNOS65+; RCT; NATION OUTCOME SCALES; CAMBERWELL ASSESSMENT; CLIENT OUTCOMES; CASE-MANAGEMENT; DUTCH VERSION; HEALTH TEAMS; OLDER-ADULTS; PEOPLE; OUTREACH; ASSOCIATIONS;
D O I
10.1186/1471-244X-14-42
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Due to fragmented mental, somatic, and social healthcare services, it can be hard to engage into care older patients with severe mental illness (SMI). In adult mental health care, assertive community treatment (ACT) is an organizational model of care for treating patients with SMI who are difficult to engage. So far all outcome studies of assertive community treatment have been conducted in adults. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial design we compared the effectiveness of ACT for elderly patients with that of treatment as usual (TAU). Sixty-two outpatients (60 years and older) with SMI who were difficult to engage in psychiatric treatment were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group (32 to ACT for elderly patients and 30 to TAU). Primary outcomes included number of patients who had a first treatment contact within 3 months, the number of dropouts (i. e. those discharged from care due to refusing care or those who unintentionally lost contact with the service over a period of at least 3 months); and patients' psychosocial functioning (HoNOS65+ scores) during 18 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the number of unmet needs and mental health care use. Analyses were based on intention-to-treat. Results: Of the 62 patients who were randomized, 26 were lost to follow-up (10 patients in ACT for elderly patients and 16 in TAU). Relative to patients with TAU, more patients allocated to ACT had a first contact within three months (96.9 versus 66.7%; X-2 (df = 1) = 9.68, p = 0.002). ACT for elderly patients also had fewer dropouts from treatment (18.8% of assertive community treatment for elderly patients versus 50% of TAU patients; X-2 (df = 1) = 6.75, p = 0.009). There were no differences in the other primary and secondary outcome variables. Conclusions: These findings suggest that ACT for elderly patients with SMI engaged patients in treatment more successfully.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Aartsen M J, 2010, Tijdschr Psychiatr, V52, P543
  • [2] Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review
    Abraha, Iosief
    Montedori, Alessandro
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 : 33
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2000, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
  • [4] Commentary: The Forgotten Older Adult With Serious Mental Illness: The Final Challenge in Achieving the Promise of Olmstead?
    Bartels, Stephen J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2011, 23 (03) : 244 - 257
  • [5] Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental illness - Critical ingredients and impact on patients
    Bond, GR
    Drake, RE
    Mueser, KT
    Latimer, E
    [J]. DISEASE MANAGEMENT & HEALTH OUTCOMES, 2001, 9 (03) : 141 - 159
  • [6] Broersma T W, 2010, Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr, V41, P13
  • [7] Predicting outcome of assertive outreach across England
    Brugha, T. S.
    Taub, N.
    Smith, J.
    Morgan, Z.
    Hill, T.
    Meltzer, H.
    Wright, C.
    Burns, T.
    Priebe, S.
    Evans, J.
    Fryers, T.
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 47 (02) : 313 - 322
  • [8] Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Elderly People (HoNOS 65+)
    Burns, A
    Beevor, A
    Lelliott, P
    Wing, J
    Blakey, A
    Orrell, M
    Mulinga, J
    Hadden, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 174 : 424 - 427
  • [9] Intensive versus standard case management for severe psychotic illness: a randomised trial
    Burns, T
    Creed, F
    Fahy, T
    Thompson, S
    Tyrer, P
    White, I
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 353 (9171) : 2185 - 2189
  • [10] Use of intensive case management to reduce time in hospital in people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-regression
    Burns, Tom
    Catty, Jocelyn
    Dash, Michael
    Roberts, Chris
    Lockwood, Austin
    Marshall, Max
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 335 (7615): : 336 - 340