Stopping anger and anxiety: Evidence that inhibitory ability predicts negative emotional responding

被引:25
作者
Tang, David [1 ]
Schmeichel, Brandon J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Psychol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Emotion; Executive functioning; Inhibition; Reactivity; Stop-signal task; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS; PSYCHOLOGY; COGNITION; BIS; BAS;
D O I
10.1080/02699931.2013.799459
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Research has begun to suggest that cognitive ability contributes to emotional processes and responses. The present study sought novel evidence for this hypothesis by examining the relationship between individual differences in the capacity for inhibitory control and responses to a common emotion-induction procedure involving autobiographical memories. Participants first completed a stop-signal task to measure inhibitory control and then underwent an anger, anxiety, or neutral emotion induction. Performance on the stop-signal task predicted emotional responses such that participants with poorer inhibitory control reported larger increases in anger following the anger induction and larger increases in anxiety across emotion induction conditions, relative to better inhibitors. These results suggest that individual differences in cognitive ability may influence the intensity of emotional states induced by common laboratory methods of emotion induction.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 142
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [21] The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions
    Miyake, Akira
    Friedman, Naomi P.
    [J]. CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 21 (01) : 8 - 14
  • [22] PENNEBAKER JW, 2001, LING INQ WORD COUNT
  • [23] Working Memory Capacity and Spontaneous Emotion Regulation: High Capacity Predicts Self-Enhancement in Response to Negative Feedback
    Schmeichel, Brandon J.
    Demaree, Heath A.
    [J]. EMOTION, 2010, 10 (05) : 739 - 744
  • [24] Working Memory Capacity and the Self-Regulation of Emotional Expression and Experience
    Schmeichel, Brandon J.
    Volokhov, Rachael N.
    Dernaree, Heath A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 95 (06) : 1526 - 1540
  • [25] Working-memory capacity explains reasoning ability -: and a little bit more
    Süss, HM
    Oberauer, K
    Wittmann, WW
    Wilhelm, O
    Schulze, R
    [J]. INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 30 (03) : 261 - 288
  • [26] Different Forms of Self-Control Share a Neurocognitive Substrate
    Tabibnia, Golnaz
    Monterosso, John R.
    Baicy, Kate
    Aron, Adam R.
    Poldrack, Russell A.
    Chakrapani, Shruthi
    Lee, Buyean
    London, Edythe D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 31 (13) : 4805 - 4810
  • [27] Business or pleasure? Utilitarian versus hedonic considerations in emotion regulation
    Tamir, Maya
    Chiu, Chi-Yue
    Gross, James J.
    [J]. EMOTION, 2007, 7 (03) : 546 - 554
  • [28] STOP IT: Windows executable software for the stop-signal paradigm
    Verbruggen, Frederick
    Logan, Gordon D.
    Stevens, Michael A.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2008, 40 (02) : 479 - 483
  • [29] Do emotional stimuli interfere with response inhibition? Evidence from the stop signal paradigm
    Verbruggen, Frederick
    De Houwer, Jan
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 2007, 21 (02) : 391 - 403