Life cycle analysis of coal-based synthetic natural gas for heat supply and electricity generation in China

被引:24
|
作者
Gao, Dan [1 ]
Qiu, Xu [1 ]
Zheng, Xianghao [1 ]
Zhang, Yuning [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Key Lab Condit Monitoring & Control Power Plant E, Beijing Key Lab Emiss Surveillance & Control Ther, Minist Educ,Sch Energy Power & Mech Engn, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[2] Xihua Univ, Key Lab Fluid & Power Machinery, Minist Educ, Chengdu 610039, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Univ, Natl Res Ctr Pumps, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN | 2018年 / 131卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Coal chemical engineering; Life cycle analysis; Synthetic natural gas; Energy efficiency; Electricity generation; Heat supply; MULTIPERIOD OPTIMIZATION MODEL; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; POWER SECTOR; VEHICLE; GHG; PERSPECTIVES; OPERATIONS; EMISSIONS; PATHWAYS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cherd.2017.10.036
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In the present paper, life cycle analysis of coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG) is performed for heat supply and electricity generation in China with a full consideration of energy efficiency, environmental pollutions and greenhouse gas emissions. Several different technical routes of SNG are studied in detail and the emissions of SO2, NORx, CO2 and energy efficiency are all calculated. For comparisons, technical routes of ultra supercritical and coal-fired power generations are also analyzed together with a direct use of coal for heat supply. Our results show that the cogeneration of heat and electricity is a suitable technical route for SNG utilization. Comparing with ultra-supercritical and coal-fired power generations, technical routes based on SNG could significantly reduce the emissions of pollutants (especially for heat supply) with an acceptable level of the energy efficiency. After synthesis of SNG, our life cycle analysis suggests that SNG should be transported to the energy demand center for further power generation locally. (C) 2017 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 722
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development of life cycle water-demand coefficients for coal-based power generation technologies
    Ali, Babkir
    Kumar, Amit
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 90 : 247 - 260
  • [22] NATURAL GAS FOR ELECTRICITY AND HEAT GENERATION - INCREASE PERSPECTIVE
    Badyda, Krzysztof
    Lewandowski, Janusz
    RYNEK ENERGII, 2009, (05): : 2 - 7
  • [23] Techno-economic and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions assessment of liquefied natural gas supply chain in China
    Zhang, Jinrui
    Meerman, Hans
    Benders, Rene
    Faaij, Andre
    ENERGY, 2021, 224
  • [24] A coal-based polygeneration system of synthetic natural gas, methanol and ethylene glycol: Process modeling and techno-economic evaluation
    Lu, Rongrong
    Zhu, Hongyue
    Wang, Anran
    Li, Jing
    Dong, Hongguang
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 320
  • [25] A Life Cycle Analysis of Deploying Coking Technology to Utilize Low-Rank Coal in China
    Li, Yan
    Wang, Guoshun
    Li, Zhaohao
    Yuan, Jiahai
    Gao, Dan
    Zhang, Heng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (12)
  • [26] Optimal design of a coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG) process with different coal ranks and gasification technologies via techno-economic analysis
    Zhang, Jingpeng
    Chu, Bozhao
    Li, Zhengwen
    Yan, Binhang
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2022, 183 : 150 - 159
  • [27] Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Electricity Generation: A Comparative Analysis of Australian Energy Sources
    Hardisty, Paul E.
    Clark, Tom S.
    Hynes, Robert G.
    ENERGIES, 2012, 5 (04) : 872 - 897
  • [28] A well-to-wire life cycle assessment of Canadian shale gas for electricity generation in China
    Raj, Ratan
    Ghandehariun, Samane
    Kumar, Amit
    Ma Linwei
    ENERGY, 2016, 111 : 642 - 652
  • [29] Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Electricity Generation
    Hsu, David D.
    O'Donoughue, Patrick
    Fthenakis, Vasilis
    Heath, Garvin A.
    Kim, Hyung Chul
    Sawyer, Pamala
    Choi, Jun-Ki
    Turney, Damon E.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 16 : S122 - S135
  • [30] Key factors for assessing climate benefits of natural gas versus coal electricity generation
    Zhang, Xiaochun
    Myhrvold, Nathan P.
    Caldeira, Ken
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 9 (11):