Hot snare polypectomy with or without saline solution/epinephrine lift for the complete resection of small colorectal polyps

被引:20
|
作者
Kim, Hyun-Soo [1 ]
Jung, Ho Yeon [1 ]
Park, Hong Jun [1 ]
Kim, Hee Man [1 ]
Seong, Jae Ho [1 ]
Kang, Yong Seok [1 ]
Cho, Mee Yon [2 ]
Yu, Min Heui [3 ]
Kang, Dae Ryong [3 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Internal Med, Wonju Coll Med, 20 Ilsan Ro, Wonju 26426, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Dept Pathol, Wonju Coll Med, Wonju, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, CBDS, Wonju Coll Med, Wonju, South Korea
关键词
COLD FORCEPS POLYPECTOMY; COLONOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CANCER; INJECTION; EFFICACY; STANDARD; SESSILE;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.031
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: The criteria for a standard polypectomy technique for complete removal of small colorectal polyps has not yet been established. This study aimed to compare the complete resection rate of hot snare polypectomy (HSP) with that of EMR for small, sessile, or flat polyps. Methods: Patients with 5- to 9-mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps were prospectively randomized to the HSP or EMR group. The presence of residual polyps was assessed by performing histologic assessment of 4-quadrant forceps biopsy specimens taken from the edges of the polypectomy site. The primary outcome was the complete resection rate after HSP or EMR; the secondary outcomes were the proportion of procedure-related adverse events and specimen-loss rate. Sample size was estimated using a superiority trial design. We assumed that the complete resection rate of the EMR group would be at least 8% higher than that of the HSP group. Results: A total of 382 polyps in 269 patients were assessed and randomly assigned to each method using 4 x 4 block randomization. Of these, 353 polyps were finally analyzed based on the pathology results. The mean polyp size was 6.3 +/- 1.3 mm. The complete resection rate did not differ between the HSP and EMR groups (88.4% [152/172] vs 92.8% [168/181], respectively; P = .2). The intraprocedural bleeding rate, immediately after polypectomy, was significantly higher in the HSP group than in the EMR group (5.2% vs 0.6%, respectively; P = .009). However, clinically significant bleeding and tissue retrieval failure rates did not differ between the groups. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, sessile serrated adenoma/polyps or hyperplastic polyps were almost 3 times (odds ratio, 2.824; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-7.75; P = .044) more likely to be incompletely resected compared with other conventional adenomatous polyps. Except for pathology, we found no significant independent predictors for incomplete resection. Conclusion: EMR for small non-pedunculated colorectal polyps is not superior to HSP in terms of complete resection or safety. Both methods can be performed according to the endoscopist's preference.
引用
收藏
页码:1539 / 1547
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effectiveness of cold snare polypectomy for the resection of small sessile colonic polyps
    Dwyer, J. P.
    Jacob, A.
    Joseph, J.
    Chandran, S.
    Efthymiou, M.
    Vaughan, R.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 32 : 21 - 21
  • [32] Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps
    Ichise, Yasuyuki
    Horiuchi, Akira
    Nakayama, Yoshiko
    Tanaka, Naoki
    DIGESTION, 2011, 84 (01) : 78 - 81
  • [33] Extended cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps increases the R0 resection rate
    Abe, Yasuhiro
    Nabeta, Haruaki
    Koyanagi, Ryota
    Nakamichi, Taro
    Hirashima, Hayato
    Lefor, Alan Kawarai
    Shinozaki, Satoshi
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (02) : E254 - E258
  • [34] Concerns Regarding Bleeding Risk of Cold vs Hot Snare Polypectomy for Small Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
    Li, Jia-Su
    Gong, Qin-Chi
    Yu, Bing
    He, Zi-Xuan
    Li, Zhao-Shen
    Bai, Yu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 119 (10): : 2141 - 2142
  • [35] Pathological Evaluation of Small Colorectal Polyps Resected by Cold snare Polypectomy
    Kawamura, Takuji
    Fujii, Yasutoshi
    Nakase, Kojiro
    Uno, Koji
    Yasuda, Kenjiro
    Katsura, Kanade
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB259 - AB259
  • [36] Is Submucosal Injection Helpful in Cold Snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps?
    Song, Ji Hyun
    Friedland, Shai
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 54 (03) : 397 - 403
  • [37] A Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Hot Snare Polypectomy and Cold Snare Polypectomy for Removing Small Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Winston, Kevin
    Maulahela, Hasan
    Raharjo, Daniell Edward
    Tjoa, Kevin
    Jonlean, Reganedgary
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [38] Complete polyp resection with cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for polyps of 4-9 mm: a randomized controlled trial
    Pedersen, Ina B.
    Rawa-Golebiewska, Anna
    Calderwood, Audrey H.
    Brix, Lone D.
    Grode, Louise B.
    Botteri, Edoardo
    Bugajski, Marek
    Kaminski, Michal F.
    Januszewicz, Wladyslaw
    Odegaard, Hjalmar
    Kleist, Britta
    Kalager, Mette
    Loberg, Magnus
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Hoff, Geir
    Medhus, Asle
    Holme, Oyvind
    ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 54 (10) : 961 - 969
  • [39] Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps Using an Exclusive Cold Polypectomy snare vs. a Conventional Polypectomy snare
    Horiuchi, Akira
    Nakayama, Yoshiko
    Makino, Toshiyuki
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB266 - AB266
  • [40] Resection of small colorectal polyps using a dedicated cold resection snare
    Weigt, J.
    Kandulski, A.
    Obst, W.
    Malfertheiner, P.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2015, 53 (12): : 1422 - 1424