External cephalic version in case of persisting breech presentation at term: Motivations and women's experience of the intervention

被引:3
作者
Pichon, M. [1 ]
Guittier, M. -J. [2 ]
Irion, O. [2 ]
Boulvain, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] HEdS, CH-1206 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Hop Univ Geneve, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Geneva, Switzerland
来源
GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE | 2013年 / 41卷 / 7-8期
关键词
External cephalic version; Breech presentation; Analogical visual scale; Verbal rating scale; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PLANNED VAGINAL DELIVERY; CESAREAN-SECTION; MOXIBUSTION; PREDICTORS; OUTCOMES; BIRTH; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.gyobfe.2012.09.029
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives. - To evaluate the efficacy and acceptability of external cephalic version (ECV). Materials and method. - From 2004 to 2008, 212 pregnant women between 34-37 weeks of gestation with fetus in breech presentation were included in a randomized clinical trial and 125 externals cephalic versions were studied. Results. - A success rate of 37.6%t was recorded. At 34 weeks of gestation, 80.6% of women were considering an ECV in the event of persistent breech position at 37 weeks. These women expressed the desire to give birth vaginally (52% versus 24.4%, P < 0.001). In contrast, others women preferred an elective cesarean section to avoid the risk of a breech vaginal delivery. Women felt pain during the ECV and scored 60 on average using the analogical visual scale. Women rated on a verbal rating scale the ECV as severely painful to unbearable (68%), and as stressful (70%). Despite this, the majority of women would recommend ECV to their friends or would be willing to repeat it for themselves. Discussion and conclusion. - ECV remains a scary and painful medical procedure. More research is needed to reduce the impact. The use of analgesic medication for this indication is controversial. Hypnosis could be an alternative to evaluate. (c) 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 432
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] External cephalic version: Predictors of success
    Aisenbrey, GA
    Catanzarite, VA
    Nelson, C
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 94 (05) : 783 - 786
  • [2] Role of cutpoints: why grade pain intensity?
    Anderson, KO
    [J]. PAIN, 2005, 113 (1-2) : 5 - 6
  • [3] [Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, GREEN TOP GUID 20A E
  • [5] Prognostic parameters for successful external cephalic version
    Ben-Meir, Assaf
    Erez, Yair
    Sela, Hen Yitzhak
    Shveiky, David
    Tsafrir, Avi
    Ezra, Yossef
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2008, 21 (09) : 660 - 662
  • [6] The relationship between amniotic fluid index and successful external cephalic version: A 14-year experience
    Boucher, M
    Bujold, E
    Marquette, GP
    Vezina, Y
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (03) : 751 - 754
  • [7] A randomised controlled trial of moxibustion for breech presentation
    Cardini, F
    Lombardo, P
    Regalia, AL
    Regaldo, G
    Zanini, A
    Negri, MG
    Panepuccia, L
    Todros, T
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (06) : 743 - 747
  • [8] Moxibustion for correction of breech presentation - A randomized controlled trial
    Cardini, F
    Huang, WX
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (18): : 1580 - 1584
  • [9] Caukwell S, 2002, J Obstet Gynaecol, V22, P486
  • [10] The complications of external cephalic version: results from 805 consecutive attempts
    Collins, S.
    Ellaway, P.
    Harrington, D.
    Pandit, M.
    Impey, L. W. M.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (05) : 636 - 638