Sugarcane bagasse and vinasse conversion to electricity and biofuels: an exergoeconomic and environmental assessment

被引:4
作者
Nakashima, Rafael Nogueira [1 ]
Florez-Orrego, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Ivan Velasquez, Hector [2 ]
de Oliveira Junior, Silvio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Mech Engn, Av Prof Mello Moraes 2231, BR-05508030 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Nacl Colombia, Fac Minas, Av 80 65,223, Medellin, Colombia
关键词
sugarcane bagasse; vinasse; ethanol; biofuels; electricity; exergoeconomy; waste upgrade; environmental assessment; greenhouse gas emissions; biorefinery; anaerobic digestion; biomass gasification; hydrogen; biomethane; synthetic natural gas; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; ECONOMIC-ASSESSMENT; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; EXERGY; GASIFICATION; REDUCTION; FUELS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1504/IJEX.2020.109623
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Biomass conversion into either electricity or biofuels requires various energy intensive processes that may drastically affect its technical and environmental competitiveness against their non-renewable counterparts. Therefore, in this paper, a comparative assessment between the total (c(T)) and non-renewable (c(NR)) unit exergy costs and specific CO(2)emissions (c(CO2)) of the electricity, methane and hydrogen produced from sugarcane vinasse and bagasse is presented and compared with the conventional (fossil fuel-based) supply chains. As a result, the non-renewable unit exergy costs and specific CO(2)emissions for the transportation service in all cases analysed are 3.1 to 4.7 times lower compared with conventional fossil fuels (e.g., diesel, gasoline, natural gas and hydrogen). Among the waste upgrade alternatives, methane production is able to maximise the exergy flow rate of products in the transformation stage (52.4-58.6 MW), while hydrogen and electricity production can substantially increase the transportation service in the end-use stage (51.7-52.1%) and the operational revenues (2,706-2,889 EUR/h).
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 75
页数:32
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, CO2 EMISSIONS FUEL C
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, WORLD EN OUTL 2018 E
  • [3] Ardila YC, 2012, COMPUT-AIDED CHEM EN, V30, P1093
  • [4] AspenTech, 2015, ASP PLUS VERS 8 8
  • [5] Modeling the anaerobic digestion of cane-molasses vinasse: Extension of the Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1) with sulfate reduction for a very high strength and sulfate rich wastewater
    Barrera, Ernesto L.
    Spanjers, Henri
    Solon, Kimberly
    Amerlinck, Youri
    Nopens, Ingmar
    Dewulf, Jo
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2015, 71 : 42 - 54
  • [6] Batstone DJ, 2002, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V45, P65
  • [7] A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels
    Channiwala, SA
    Parikh, PP
    [J]. FUEL, 2002, 81 (08) : 1051 - 1063
  • [8] Cherif H., 2016, ICBST 2016 18 INT C
  • [9] Production and use of biogas from vinasse: Implications for the energy balance and GHG emissions of sugar cane ethanol in the brazilian context
    da Silva Neto, Jorge Vinicius
    Gallo, Waldyr L. R.
    Abdul Nour, Edson Aparecido
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2020, 39 (01)
  • [10] Integrated versus stand-alone second generation ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse and trash
    Dias, Marina O. S.
    Junqueira, Tassia L.
    Cavalett, Otavio
    Cunha, Marcelo P.
    Jesus, Charles D. F.
    Rossell, Carlos E. V.
    Maciel Filho, Rubens
    Bonomi, Antonio
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 103 (01) : 152 - 161