Eye Tracking for Assessment of Mental Workload and Evaluation of RVD Interface

被引:2
作者
Tian, Yu [1 ]
Zhang, Shaoyao [1 ]
Wang, Chunhui [1 ]
Yan, Qu [1 ]
Chen, Shanguang [1 ]
机构
[1] China Astronaut Res & Training Ctr, Natl Key Lab Human Factors Engn, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
来源
MAN-MACHINE-ENVIRONMENT SYSTEM ENGINEERING, MMESE 2018 | 2019年 / 527卷
关键词
Eye tracking; Manually controlled rendezvous and docking; Workload; Interface evaluation;
D O I
10.1007/978-981-13-2481-9_2
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Eye tracking is increasingly employed to evaluate operators' mental workload and the usability of interfaces. In this paper, eye tracking data were recorded for ten operators performing the simulated manually controlled rendezvous and docking (manual RVD) of two space vehicles. Indices such as blink rate, blink duration, percent eyelid closure (PERCLOS) were calculated to assess the mental workload and fatigue level of the operators. Fixation measures were analyzed to investigate the attention allocation of the operators on the different information areas on the display. Results showed that the workload of the RVD task was generally acceptable. However, workload increased in the accurate control stage (the last 20 meters' approaching) compared to the tracking control stage (the more distant approaching). The fixation measures showed that human eyes were mostly fixed on the area of the spacecraft image, while numerical display areas provided compensatory information. The present study revealed that the design of the RVD interface supported human perception and task completion.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 17
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Eye-Tracking in Assessment of the Mental Workload of Harvester Operators
    Naskrent, Bartlomiej
    Grzywinski, Witold
    Polowy, Krzysztof
    Tomczak, Arkadiusz
    Jelonek, Tomasz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (09)
  • [2] Supervision of Multiple Remote Tower Centers: Evaluating a New Air Traffic Control Interface Based on Mental Workload and Eye Tracking
    Materne, Leo Julius
    Friedrich, Maik
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS, 2025, 55 (02) : 114 - 123
  • [3] Mental Workload Assessment Using Machine Learning Techniques Based on EEG and Eye Tracking Data
    Aksu, Seniz Harputlu
    Cakit, Erman
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (06):
  • [4] A machine learning approach to classify mental workload based on eye tracking data
    Aksu, Seniz Harputlu
    Cakit, Erman
    JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2023, 38 (02): : 1027 - 1039
  • [5] Eye Tracking-Based Workload and Performance Assessment for Skill Acquisition
    Mark, Jesse
    Curtin, Adrian
    Kraft, Amanda
    Sands, Trevor
    Casebeer, William D.
    Ziegler, Matthias
    Ayaz, Hasan
    ADVANCES IN NEUROERGONOMICS AND COGNITIVE ENGINEERING, 2020, 953 : 129 - 141
  • [6] Eye tracking for assessment of workload: a pilot study in an anaesthesia simulator environment
    Schulz, C. M.
    Schneider, E.
    Fritz, L.
    Vockeroth, J.
    Hapfelmeier, A.
    Wasmaier, M.
    Kochs, E. F.
    Schneider, G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 106 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [7] Eye Tracking Analytics for Mental States Assessment - A Review
    Li, Fan
    Xu, Gangyan
    Feng, Shanshan
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2021, : 2266 - 2271
  • [8] User Interface Evaluation Method using Eye Tracking
    Zhou, Sun Rou
    Jeon, Seongsin
    Sim, Hanmoi
    Lee, Wonhyung
    18TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS (ISCE 2014), 2014,
  • [9] Adaptive Interface Model with Eye-Tracking Evaluation
    Bagustari, Bintang Annisa
    Sari, Felisia Novita
    Sensuse, Dana Indra
    Santoso, Harry Budi
    2019 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ICACSIS 2019), 2019, : 77 - 82
  • [10] Eye Tracking to Evaluate the Effects of Interruptions and Workload in a Complex Task
    Kanaan, Dina
    Moacdieh, Nadine Marie
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2022, 64 (07) : 1168 - 1180