Adaptive governance: Livelihood innovation for climate resilience in Uganda

被引:53
作者
Cooper, Sarah J. [1 ]
Wheeler, Tim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Sch Agr Policy & Dev, Walker Inst Climate Syst Res, Reading RG6 6AR, Berks, England
关键词
Climate change adaptation; Adaptive governance; Social learning; Livelihoods; Uganda; CHANGE ADAPTATION; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; COMANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT; CAPACITY; POLICY; PARTICIPATION; PATHWAYS; RISK; TRANSFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.015
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Adaptive governance is the use of novel approaches within policy to support experimentation and learning. Social learning reflects the engagement of interdependent stakeholders within this learning. Much attention has focused on these concepts as a solution for resilience in governing institutions in an uncertain climate; resilience representing the ability of a system to absorb shock and to retain its function and form through reorganisation. However, there are still many questions to how these concepts enable resilience, particularly in vulnerable, developing contexts. A case study from Uganda presents how these concepts promote resilient livelihood outcomes among rural subsistence farmers within a decentralised governing framework. This approach has the potential to highlight the dynamics and characteristics of a governance system which may manage change. The paper draws from the enabling characteristics of adaptive governance, including lower scale dynamics of bonding and bridging ties and strong leadership. Central to these processes were learning platforms promoting knowledge transfer leading to improved self-efficacy, innovation and livelihood skills. However even though aspects of adaptive governance were identified as contributing to resilience in livelihoods, some barriers were identified. Reflexivity and multi-stakeholder collaboration were evident in governing institutions; however, limited self-organisation and vertical communication demonstrated few opportunities for shifts in governance, which was severely challenged by inequity, politicisation and elite capture. The paper concludes by outlining implications for climate adaptation policy through promoting the importance of mainstreaming adaptation alongside existing policy trajectories; highlighting the significance of collaborative spaces for stakeholders and the tackling of inequality and corruption. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 107
页数:12
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]   Exploring poverty traps and social exclusion in South Africa using qualitative and quantitative data [J].
Adato, M ;
Carter, MR ;
May, J .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2006, 42 (02) :226-247
[2]  
Adger W.N., 2011, OXFORD HDB CLIMATE C, P696
[3]  
Adger WN, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P77, DOI [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.03.001]
[4]  
Adger WN, 2003, ECON GEOGR, V79, P387
[5]  
Ahikire Josephine., 2007, LOCALISED LOCALISING
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, CLIM CHANG FOOD SEC
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, UG HUM DEV REP 2007
[8]   Reconciling national and global priorities in adaptation to climate change: With an illustration from Uganda [J].
Apuuli, B ;
Wright, J ;
Elias, C ;
Burton, I .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2000, 61 (01) :145-159
[9]  
Argyris C., 1974, THEORY PRACTICE INCR
[10]  
Ariko J., 2009, ADDRESSING EFFECTS C