Collaboration and its influence on retraction based on retracted publications during 1978-2017

被引:29
作者
Zhang, Qin [1 ]
Abraham, Juneman [2 ]
Fu, Hui-Zhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Dept Informat Resources Management, 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[2] Bina Nusantara Univ, Fac Humanities, Psychol Dept, BINUS Kampus Kijang,Jl Kemanggisan Ilir 3 45, Palmerah 11480, Dki Jakarta, Indonesia
关键词
Bibliometrics; Retracted publications; Collaboration; Coauthorship; Scientific misconduct; RESEARCH MISCONDUCT; INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY; CO-AUTHORSHIP; IMPACT; NETWORKS; COAUTHORSHIP; ARTICLES; GROWTH; TREND;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-020-03636-w
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Scientific collaboration has considerably grown in recent years, and has been recognized as a positive factor for research productivity and quality. This study is aimed at exploring the collaboration in retracted publications and the influence on different kinds of scientific misbehaviors based on 4842 retracted publications in Web of Science Core Collection from 1978 to 2017. Search results showed that the proportion of international collaborations in retracted publications has fluctuated at around 20% in the past 17 years, and different collaboration patterns of major countries are revealed. The USA and China contributed to more than half of all retracted publications, while retraction rate of Chinese papers was three times higher compared to papers from the USA. A negative correlation between the proportion of internationally collaborative publications and the retraction rate was found. Countries involved in more international collaborations tend to have lower retraction rates. Also, the occurrences of plagiarism was found to be lower when a paper is contributed by more authors, while falsification or manipulation, errors or unreliable results appeared more frequently under the same condition. Conclusions are made with a focus on the need for more actions to strengthen the scientific norms and integrity within collaborative groups.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 232
页数:20
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] The balance of knowledge flows
    Abramo, Giovanni
    D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea
    Carloni, Massimiliano
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2019, 13 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [2] National-scale research performance assessment at the individual level
    Abramo, Giovanni
    D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 86 (02) : 347 - 364
  • [3] Detecting errors that result in retractions
    Andersen, Line Edslev
    Wray, K. Brad
    [J]. SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2019, 49 (06) : 942 - 954
  • [4] The evolutions of the rich get richer and the fit get richer phenomena in scholarly networks: the case of the strategic management journal
    Armando Ronda-Pupo, Guillermo
    Thong Pham
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 116 (01) : 363 - 383
  • [5] An analysis of Malaysian retracted papers: Misconduct or mistakes?
    Aspura, M. K. Yanti Idaya
    Noorhidawati, A.
    Abrizah, A.
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 115 (03) : 1315 - 1328
  • [6] How collaboration type, publication place, funding and author's role affect citations received by publications from Africa: A bibliometric study of LIS research from 1996 to 2015
    Asubiaro, Toluwase
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2019, 120 (03) : 1261 - 1287
  • [7] Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority?
    Beaver, DD
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2004, 60 (03) : 399 - 408
  • [8] Bennett Dianne M, 2003, Emerg Med (Fremantle), V15, P263, DOI 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00432.x
  • [9] The relationship between the research performance of scientists and their position in co-authorship networks in three fields
    Bordons, Maria
    Aparicio, Javier
    Gonzalez-Albo, Borja
    Diaz-Faes, Adrian A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2015, 9 (01) : 135 - 144
  • [10] BOZEMAN B, 2013, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V38, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S10961-012-9281-8, DOI 10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8]