A critical review on the accounting of energy in virtual water trade

被引:5
作者
Chini, Christopher M. [1 ]
Nugent, Jenni [2 ]
Stillwell, Ashlynn S. [2 ]
Peer, Rebecca A. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] US Air Force, Inst Technol, Dept Syst Engn & Management, 2950 Hobson Way, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 205 N Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Univ Canterbury, Dept Civil & Nat Resources Engn, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Water footprint; Energy-water nexus; Virtual water trade; Energy; Electricity; ELECTRICITY; FOOTPRINT; IMPACT; FLOWS; CHINA; COAL; CONSEQUENCES; CONSUMPTION; BASES; BLUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134558
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Virtual water trade analysis investigates the embedded volume of water associated with the movement of a good from production to consumption. Energy-derived virtual water trade includes electricity, fossil fuels, and other energy resources and their water footprints. This growing field aids in understanding competition for scarce resources and the burden shift from energy consumption to production. This review investigates recent trends in energy virtual water trade from 2007-2021. Through the review, we find several limitations of the current practice, including lack of inclusion of hydroelectric footprints, inconsistent definitions of water footprint, and varying methods of assessment. A majority of studies assessed virtual water trade at the annual scale, neglecting inter-annual variability, and were primarily focused on a few locations, such as China and the United States. We recommend that future studies improve understanding of sub-annual variability in virtual water trade, prioritize local empirical data to avoid data misappropriation, and characterize uncertainty to promote policy. Through this review of virtual water of energy research, we identify existing themes and propose future directions to facilitate enhanced utility of the methods.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 73 条
[51]  
Peer R.A.M., 2021, ENV RES INFRASTRUCT, V1
[52]   An integrated assessment of the global virtual water trade network of energy [J].
Peer, Rebecca A. M. ;
Chini, Christopher M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (11)
[53]   The water consequences of a transitioning US power sector [J].
Peer, Rebecca A. M. ;
Sanders, Kelly T. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 210 :613-622
[54]   Characterizing cooling water source and usage patterns across US thermoelectric power plants: a comprehensive assessment of self-reported cooling water data [J].
Peer, Rebecca A. M. ;
Sanders, Kelly T. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 11 (12)
[55]   Spatially and Temporally Resolved Analysis of Environmental Trade-Offs in Electricity Generation [J].
Peer, Rebecca A. M. ;
Garrison, Jared B. ;
Timms, Craig P. ;
Sanders, Kelly T. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (08) :4537-4545
[56]  
Rees WE., 1992, ENVIRON URBAN, V4, P121, DOI [10.1177/095624789200400212, DOI 10.1177/095624789200400212]
[57]   Unlocking the Impacts of COVID-19 Lockdowns: Changes in Thermal Electricity Generation Water Footprint and Virtual Water Trade in Europe [J].
Roidt, Mario ;
Chini, Christopher M. ;
Stillwell, Ashlynn S. ;
Cominola, Andrea .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 2020, 7 (09) :683-689
[58]   Comparative Assessment of Models and Methods To Calculate Grid Electricity Emissions [J].
Ryan, Nicole A. ;
Johnson, Jeremiah X. ;
Keoleian, Gregory A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (17) :8937-8953
[59]   Critical Review: Uncharted Waters? The Future of the Electricity-Water Nexus [J].
Sanders, Kelly T. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (01) :51-66
[60]   Evaluating the energy consumed for water use in the United States [J].
Sanders, Kelly T. ;
Webber, Michael E. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 7 (03)