Evaluation of Uncertainties in the Seismic Assessment of Existing Masonry Buildings

被引:38
作者
Tondelli, Marco [2 ]
Rota, Maria [1 ,3 ]
Penna, Andrea [1 ,4 ]
Magenes, Guido [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] EUCENTRE, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[2] IUSS Pavia, ROSE Sch, MEEES, Pavia, Italy
[3] European Ctr Training & Res Earthquake Engn EUCEN, Pavia, Italy
[4] Univ Pavia, Dept Civil Engn & Architecture, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
关键词
Masonry; Seismic Assessment; Knowledge Level; Confidence Factor; Monte Carlo Simulation;
D O I
10.1080/13632469.2012.670578
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The assessment of existing masonry buildings is an important issue in earthquake prone countries like Italy. The current Italian building code, which adopts the approach proposed by Eurocode 8, includes an assessment procedure based on the use of confidence factors, whose values depend on the level of knowledge of the structure. These factors are intended to take into account all possible uncertainties related to the incomplete knowledge of the structure. This article investigates the reliability of the code-based procedure for the assessment of existing masonry buildings and pinpoints some problematic aspects. The approach followed is the simulation of the entire code-based assessment procedure, with the flow of decisions that an engineer would face in the assessment of an existing building schematized in the form of a logic tree. The proposed simulated procedure accounts for different sources of epistemic uncertainty like the selection of the level of knowledge, uncertainty in the results and location of in-situ tests, identification of several structural details, etc. A Monte Carlo procedure allows the simulation of a large number of random assessments intended to be performed by different virtual engineers. The results are then compared with those coming from the assessment of the "perfectly known" structure, used as a benchmark, providing an estimate of the validity of the codified assessment methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 64
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uncertainties in the Seismic Assessment of Historical Masonry Buildings
    Tomic, Igor
    Vanin, Francesco
    Beyer, Katrin
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (05): : 1 - 36
  • [2] Seismic fragility assessment of existing masonry buildings in aggregate
    Angiolilli, Michele
    Lagomarsino, Sergio
    Cattari, Serena
    Degli Abbati, Stefania
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 247
  • [3] Modeling criteria for the seismic assessment of existing masonry buildings
    Sulla, Roselena
    D'Amato, Michele
    Gigliotti, Rosario
    Liberatore, Domenico
    XIX ANIDIS CONFERENCE, SEISMIC ENGINEERING IN ITALY, 2023, 44 : 998 - 1005
  • [4] Safety Evaluation of Existing RC Buildings: Uncertainties Due to the Location of In Situ Tests
    Sepe, Vincenzo
    Diaferio, Mariella
    Caraccio, Roberta
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [5] A framework for the seismic assessment of existing masonry buildings accounting for different sources of uncertainty
    Rota, M.
    Penna, A.
    Magenes, G.
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2014, 43 (07) : 1045 - 1066
  • [6] Are the nonlinear static procedures feasible for the seismic assessment of irregular existing masonry buildings?
    Marino, Salvatore
    Cattari, Serena
    Lagomarsino, Sergio
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 200
  • [7] Investigating the Reliability of Nonlinear Static Procedures for the Seismic Assessment of Existing Masonry Buildings
    Giusto, Sofia
    Cattari, Serena
    Lagomarsino, Sergio
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [8] Sensitivity analysis of the seismic performance of existing masonry buildings
    Mendes, Nuno
    Lourenco, Paulo B.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 80 : 137 - 146
  • [9] Seismic Assessment of Masonry oGaioleiroo Buildings in Lisbon, Portugal
    Mendes, Nuno
    Lourenco, Paulo B.
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2010, 14 (01) : 80 - 101
  • [10] Seismic assessment of existing RC buildings
    Fardis, MN
    Panagiotakos, TB
    Biskinis, D
    Kosmopoulos, A
    SEISMIC ASSESSMENT AND REHABILITATION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS, 2003, 29 : 215 - 244