Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in assessing bladder cancer invasiveness and cell proliferation

被引:30
作者
Wang, Fang [1 ]
Wu, Lian-Ming [1 ]
Hua, Xiao-Lan [1 ]
Zhao, Zi-Zhou [1 ]
Chen, Xiao-Xi [1 ]
Xu, Jian-Rong [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Ren Ji Hosp, Dept Radiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
intravoxel incoherent motion; diffusion-weighted imaging; bladder cancer; invasiveness; RADICAL CYSTECTOMY; LABELING INDEX; TUMOR; IVIM; MRI; DIFFERENTIATION; COEFFICIENT; PERFUSION; LESIONS; KI-67;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.25839
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundNonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC, Stage T1 or lower) is treated with transurethral resection (TUR), while muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC, Stage T2 or more) requires neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy. Hence, preoperative differentiation is vital. PurposeTo investigate whether intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can differentiate NMIBC from MIBC and to assess whether there were correlations between IVIM parameters and the Ki-67 labeling index (LI). Study TypeRetrospective. SubjectsThirty-six patients diagnosed with bladder cancer confirmed by histopathological findings. Field Strength/Sequence3.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) DWI with eight b-values ranging from 0 to 1000 s/mm(2). AssessmentMolecular diffusion coefficient (D), perfusion-related diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were calculated by biexponential and monoexponential models fits, respectively. Statistical TestsComparisons were made between the MIBC and NMIBC group, and differences were analyzed by comparing the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUCs). The correlations between these parameters and Ki-67 LI were assessed by Spearman's rank correlation analysis. ResultsThe ADC and D value were significantly lower in patients with MIBC compared to those with NMIBC (P < 0.01). No significant (P > 0.05) differences were observed in D* and f. The AUC of D value (0.894) was significantly (P < 0.05) larger than the ADC value (0.786), with sensitivities and specificities of 95% and 87.5% (D) and 80% and 68.7% (ADC), respectively. In addition, the D and ADC values were significantly correlated with Ki-67 LI (r=-0.785, r=-0.643, respectively; both P < 0.01). Data ConclusionThe D value obtained from IVIM exhibited better performance than conventional DWI for distinguishing NMIBC from MIBC and may serve as a potential imaging biomarker for bladder cancer invasion. Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1054-1060.
引用
收藏
页码:1054 / 1060
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Utility of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating renal cell carcinoma from angiomyolipoma
    Li, Congrui
    Liu, Yan
    Yu, Xiaoping
    Xie, Yu
    Sun, Yan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (06): : 9306 - 9313
  • [32] Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for evaluating the pancreatic perfusion in cirrhotic patients
    Ran Hu
    Guo-Fei Zeng
    Yu Fang
    Lisha Nie
    Hui-Lou Liang
    Zhi-Gang Wang
    Hua Yang
    Abdominal Radiology, 2024, 49 : 492 - 500
  • [33] Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of gliomas: efficacy in preoperative grading
    Hu, Yu-Chuan
    Yan, Lin-Feng
    Wu, Lang
    Du, Pang
    Chen, Bao-Ying
    Wang, Liang
    Wang, Shu-Mei
    Han, Yu
    Tian, Qiang
    Yu, Ying
    Xu, Tian-Yong
    Wang, Wen
    Cui, Guang-Bin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2014, 4
  • [34] Quantitative analysis of the intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) parameters in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Tripathi, Praveen
    Karthik, Adiraju
    Singh, Dharmesh
    Kumar, Dileep
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 7 (03) : 229 - 236
  • [35] Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for Hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histologic grade
    Granata, Vincenza
    Fusco, Roberta
    Catalano, Orlando
    Guarino, Benedetta
    Granata, Francesco
    Tatangelo, Fabiana
    Avallone, Antonio
    Piccirillo, Mauro
    Palaia, Raffaele
    Izzo, Francesco
    Petrillo, Antonella
    ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (48) : 79343 - 79350
  • [36] Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Primary Rectal Carcinoma: Correlation with Histopathology
    Lu, Baolan
    Yang, Xinyue
    Xiao, Xiaojuan
    Chen, Yan
    Yan, Xu
    Yu, Shenping
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2018, 24 : 2429 - 2436
  • [37] Detection of Active Sacroiliitis with Ankylosing Spondylitis through Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging
    Zhao, Ying-hua
    Li, Shao-lin
    Liu, Zai-yi
    Chen, Xin
    Zhao, Xiang-cheng
    Hu, Shao-yong
    Liu, Zhen-hua
    Mei, Ying-jie M. S.
    Chan, Queenie
    Liang, Chang-hong
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (09) : 2754 - 2763
  • [38] Volumetric Analysis of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Predicting the Response to Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Jiang, Jianqin
    Leng, Yue
    Liu, Jia
    Yin, Jianbing
    Xiao, Yong
    Gu, Xiaowen
    Zhang, Liang
    Fu, Yigang
    Xu, Gaofeng
    Cui, Lei
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2022, 46 (03) : 406 - 412
  • [39] Comparison of monoexponential, intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging for assessment of hepatic fibrosis
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Lee, Kyung Bun
    Kim, Dongeun
    Kabasawa, Hiroyuki
    Han, Joon Koo
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2019, 60 (12) : 1593 - 1601
  • [40] Intravoxel Incoherent Motion in Normal Pituitary Gland: Initial Study with Turbo Spin-Echo Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
    Kamimura, K.
    Nakajo, M.
    Fukukura, Y.
    Iwanaga, T.
    Saito, T.
    Sasaki, M.
    Fujisaki, T.
    Takemura, A.
    Okuaki, T.
    Yoshiura, T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2016, 37 (12) : 2328 - 2333