A Comparative Analysis of Maximum Power Point Techniques for Solar Photovoltaic Systems

被引:37
作者
Devarakonda, Ashwin Kumar [1 ]
Karuppiah, Natarajan [1 ]
Selvaraj, Tamilselvi [2 ]
Balachandran, Praveen Kumar [1 ]
Shanmugasundaram, Ravivarman [1 ]
Senjyu, Tomonobu [3 ]
机构
[1] Vardhaman Coll Engn, Dept EEE, Hyderabad 501218, Telangana, India
[2] Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar Coll Engn, Dept EEE, Chennai 603110, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Univ Ryukyus, Fac Engn, Nishihara, Okinawa 9030213, Japan
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
solar photovoltaic systems; maximum power point tracking; MPP algorithms; P&O; incremental conductance; fuzzy logic control; ANFIS; neural network; hybrid model; TRACKING TECHNIQUES; PV SYSTEM; HYBRID; MPPT; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.3390/en15228776
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The characteristics of a PV (photovoltaic) module is non-linear and vary with nature. The tracking of maximum power point (MPP) at various atmospheric conditions is essential for the reliable operation of solar-integrated power generation units. This paper compares the most widely used maximum power point tracking (MPPT) techniques such as the perturb and observe method (P&O), incremental conductance method (INC), fuzzy logic controller method (FLC), neural network (NN) model, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system method (ANFIS) with the modern approach of the hybrid method (neural network + P&O) for PV systems. The hybrid method combines the strength of the neural network and P&O in a single framework. The PV system is composed of a PV panel, converter, MPPT unit, and load modelled using MATLAB/Simulink. These methods differ in their characteristics such as convergence speed, ease of implementation, sensors used, cost, and range of efficiencies. Based on all these, performances are evaluated. In this analysis, the drawbacks of the methods are studied, and wastage of the panel's available output energy is observed. The hybrid technique concedes a spontaneous recovery during dynamic changes in environmental conditions. The simulation results illustrate the improvements obtained by the hybrid method in comparison to other techniques.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Novel hybrid improved bat algorithm and fuzzy system based MPPT for photovoltaic under variable atmospheric conditions [J].
Ali, Ziad M. ;
Alquthami, Thamer ;
Alkhalaf, Salem ;
Norouzi, Hojat ;
Dadfar, Sajjad ;
Suzuki, Kengo .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2022, 52
[2]  
Arjun M., 2018, 2018 International CET Conference on Control, Communication, and Computing (IC4), P140, DOI 10.1109/CETIC4.2018.8530922
[3]  
Atri P. K., 2020, 2020 INT C POW EL IO, DOI [10.1109/PARC49193.2020.236559, DOI 10.1109/PARC49193.2020.236559]
[4]  
Aurilio Gianluca, 2014, Advances in Power Electronics, DOI 10.1155/2014/125918
[5]  
Aziz MS., 2020, INT J ELECT COMPUT E, V10, P5083
[6]  
Azzouz S., 2019, MODEL MEAS CONTROL, V92, P23, DOI DOI 10.18280/MMC_A.920104
[7]   A Novel Hybrid MPPT Controller Based on Bond Graph and Fuzzy Logic in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell System: Experimental Validation [J].
Badoud, Abd Essalam ;
Mekhilef, Saad ;
Bouamama, Belkacem Ould .
ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 47 (03) :3201-3220
[8]   Improved hybrid algorithms-based MPPT algorithm for PV system operating under severe weather conditions [J].
Bataineh, Khaled .
IET POWER ELECTRONICS, 2019, 12 (04) :703-711
[9]  
Beriber Dalila, 2013, 4th International Conference on Power Engineering, Energy and Electrical Drives (POWERENG), P1437, DOI 10.1109/PowerEng.2013.6635826
[10]  
Berry M., 2009, Project Evaluation Conference, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/PTC.2009.5282010