Evaluating Imaging and Computer-aided Detection and Diagnosis Devices at the FDA

被引:69
作者
Gallas, Brandon D. [1 ]
Chan, Heang-Ping [2 ]
D'Orsi, Carl J. [3 ]
Dodd, Lori E. [4 ]
Giger, Maryellen L. [5 ]
Gur, David [6 ]
Krupinski, Elizabeth A. [7 ]
Metz, Charles E. [5 ]
Myers, Kyle J. [1 ]
Obuchowski, Nancy A. [8 ]
Sahiner, Berkman [1 ]
Toledano, Alicia Y. [9 ]
Zuley, Margarita L.
机构
[1] US FDA, Div Imaging & Appl Math, Ctr Devices & Radiol Hlth, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] NIAID, Biostat Res Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[7] Univ Arizona, Dept Radiol, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[8] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[9] Stat Collaborat Inc, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Reader studies; designs; methods; ROC; premarket; postmarket; consensus; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGISTS PERFORMANCE; OBSERVER PERFORMANCE; STATISTICAL POWER; FEATURE-SELECTION; FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; PARTIAL AREAS; LUNG NODULES; SAMPLE-SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2011.12.016
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This report summarizes the Joint FDA-MIPS Workshop on Methods for the Evaluation of Imaging and Computer-Assist Devices. The purpose of the workshop was to gather information on the current state of the science and facilitate consensus development on statistical methods and study designs for the evaluation of imaging devices to support US Food and Drug Administration submissions. Additionally, participants expected to identify gaps in knowledge and unmet needs that should be addressed in future research. This summary is intended to document the topics that were discussed at the meeting and disseminate the lessons that have been learned through past studies of imaging and computer-aided detection and diagnosis device performance.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 477
页数:15
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]   Assessing accuracy of a continuous screening test in the presence of verification bias [J].
Alonzo, TA ;
Pepe, MS .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2005, 54 :173-190
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1980, CLIN DECISION ANAL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[7]   Assessment of Radiologist Performance in the Detection of Lung Nodules: Dependence on the Definition of "Truth" [J].
Armato, Samuel G., III ;
Roberts, Rachael Y. ;
Kocherginsky, Masha ;
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Kazerooni, Ella A. ;
MacMahon, Heber ;
van Beek, Edwin J. R. ;
Yankelevitz, David ;
McLennan, Geoffrey ;
McNitt-Gray, Michael F. ;
Meyer, Charles R. ;
Reeves, Anthony P. ;
Caligiuri, Philip ;
Quint, Leslie E. ;
Sundaram, Baskaran ;
Croft, Barbara Y. ;
Clarke, Laurence P. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2009, 16 (01) :28-38
[8]  
Babinski Paul J, 2011, Radiol Manage, V33, P45
[9]   A proposed design and analysis for comparing digital and analog mammography: Special receiver operating characteristic methods for cancer screening [J].
Baker, SG ;
Pinsky, PF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 96 (454) :421-428
[10]   Consensus Interpretation in Imaging Research: Is There a Better Way? [J].
Bankier, Alexander A. ;
Levine, Deborah ;
Halpern, Elkan F. ;
Kressel, Herbert Y. .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 257 (01) :14-17