Consistency of performance ranking of comorbidity adjustment scores in Canadian and US utilization data

被引:68
作者
Schneeweiss, S
Wang, PS
Avorn, J
Maclure, M
Levin, R
Glynn, RJ
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Boston, MA 02120 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Prevent Med, Boston, MA 02120 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
comorbidity adjustment; confounding (epidemiology); prediction; claims data; methods;
D O I
10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30109.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The performance of standard comorbidity scores to control confounding is poorly defined in health care utilization data across elderly populations. We sought to evaluate and rank the performance of comorbidity scores across selected U.S. and Canadian elderly populations using health care utilization databases. Design: Cross-population validation study. Participants: Study participants were residents age 65 years or older who had prescription drug coverage through state-funded programs selected from several large health care utilization databases available to the investigators: British Columbia, BC (N = 141,161), New Jersey, NJ (N = 235,881), and Pennsylvania, PA (N = 230,913). Measurements: We calculated 6 commonly used comorbidity scores for all subjects during the baseline year (1994 for NJ and PA, and 1995 for BC). These included scores based on diagnoses (Romano, Deyo, D'Hoore, Ghali) and prescription drugs (CDS-1, CDS-2). The study outcome was 1-year mortality. The performance of scores was measured by c-statistics derived from multivariate logistic regression that included age and gender. Main Results: Across these 4 large elderly populations, we found the same rank order of performance in predicting 1-year mortality after including age and gender in each model: Romano (c-statistic 0.754 to 0.771), Deyo (c-statistic 0.753 to 0.768), D'Hoore (c-statistic 0.745 to 0.760), Ghali (c-statistic 0.733 to 0.745), CDS-1 (c-statistic 0.689 to 0.738), CDS-2 (c-statistic 0.677 to 0.718), and age and gender alone (c-statistic 0.664 to 0.681). Performance was improved by an average of 6% by adding the number of different prescription drugs received during the past year. Conclusions: Performance ranking of 6 frequently used comorbidity scores was consistent across selected elderly populations. We recommend that investigators use these performance data as one important factor when selecting a comorbidity score for epidemiologic analyses of health care utilization data.
引用
收藏
页码:444 / 450
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
*AM SOC HLTH SYST, 1996, AHFS DRUG INF 96
[2]  
ANDERSON GM, 1993, INQUIRY-J HEALTH CAR, V30, P199
[3]  
ASH AS, 1997, RISK ADJUSTMENT MEAS
[4]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[5]   A CHRONIC DISEASE SCORE WITH EMPIRICALLY DERIVED WEIGHTS [J].
CLARK, DO ;
VONKORFF, M ;
SAUNDERS, K ;
BALUCH, WM ;
SIMON, GE .
MEDICAL CARE, 1995, 33 (08) :783-795
[6]   ADAPTING A CLINICAL COMORBIDITY INDEX FOR USE WITH ICD-9-CM ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES [J].
DEYO, RA ;
CHERKIN, DC ;
CIOL, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (06) :613-619
[7]   Practical considerations on the use of the Charlson comorbidity index with administrative data bases [J].
DHoore, W ;
Bouckaert, A ;
Tilquin, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 49 (12) :1429-1433
[8]  
DHOORE W, 1993, METHOD INFORM MED, V32, P382
[9]   Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data [J].
Elixhauser, A ;
Steiner, C ;
Harris, DR ;
Coffey, RN .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (01) :8-27
[10]   THE ACCURACY OF MEDICARES HOSPITAL CLAIMS DATA - PROGRESS HAS BEEN MADE, BUT PROBLEMS REMAIN [J].
FISHER, ES ;
WHALEY, FS ;
KRUSHAT, WM ;
MALENKA, DJ ;
FLEMING, C ;
BARON, JA ;
HSIA, DC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1992, 82 (02) :243-248