Speaking up for patient safety by hospital-based health care professionals: a literature review

被引:322
作者
Okuyama, Ayako [1 ]
Wagner, Cordula [2 ,3 ]
Bijnen, Bart [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Total Hlth Promot Sci, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] NIVEL Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, NL-3500 BN Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Med Ctr Alkmaar, Foreest Med Sch, NL-1815 JD Alkmaar, Netherlands
关键词
Speaking up; Inter-professional relations; Patient care team; Patient safety; Communication; COMMUNICATION; SILENCE; VOICE; ACCOUNTABILITY; RESIDENTS; TEAMWORK; PROGRAM; NURSES; LABOR; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-14-61
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Speaking up is important for patient safety, but often, health care professionals hesitate to voice concerns. Understanding the influencing factors can help to improve speaking-up behaviour and team communication. This review focused on health care professionals' speaking-up behaviour for patient safety and aimed at (1) assessing the effectiveness of speaking up, (2) evaluating the effectiveness of speaking-up training, (3) identifying the factors influencing speaking-up behaviour, and (4) developing a model for speaking-up behaviour. Methods: Five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) were searched for English articles describing health care professionals' speaking- up behaviour as well as those evaluating the relationship between speaking up and patient safety. Influencing factors were identified and then integrated into a model of voicing behaviour. Results: In total, 26 studies were identified in 27 articles. Some indicated that hesitancy to speak up can be an important contributing factor in communication errors and that training can improve speaking- up behaviour. Many influencing factors were found: (1) the motivation to speak up, such as the perceived risk for patients, and the ambiguity or clarity of the clinical situation; (2) contextual factors, such as hospital administrative support, interdisciplinary policy- making, team work and relationship between other team members, and attitude of leaders/ superiors; (3) individual factors, such as job satisfaction, responsibility toward patients, responsibility as professionals, confidence based on experience, communication skills, and educational background; (4) the perceived efficacy of speaking up, such as lack of impact and personal control; (5) the perceived safety of speaking up, such as fear for the responses of others and conflict and concerns over appearing incompetent; and (6) tactics and targets, such as collecting facts, showing positive intent, and selecting the person who has spoken up. Conclusions: Hesitancy to speak up can be an important contributing factor to communication errors. Our model helps us to understand how health care professionals think about voicing their concerns. Further research is required to investigate the relative importance of different factors.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Attree Moira, 2007, J Nurs Manag, V15, P392, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00679.x
[2]   Poor Resident-Attending Intraoperative Communication May Compromise Patient Safety [J].
Belyansky, Igor ;
Martin, Terri R. ;
Prabhu, Ajita S. ;
Tsirline, Victor B. ;
Howley, Lisa D. ;
Phillips, Ryan ;
Sindram, David ;
Heniford, B. Todd ;
Stefanidis, Dimitrios .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 171 (02) :386-394
[3]   A sensemaking lens on reliability [J].
Blatt, Ruth ;
Christianson, Marlys K. ;
Sutcliffe, Kathleen M. ;
Rosenthal, Marilynn M. .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2006, 27 (07) :897-917
[4]  
Churchman J J, 2010, Nurs Stand, V24, P42
[5]   Profiles in patient safety: Authority gradients in medical error [J].
Cosby, KS ;
Croskerry, P .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 11 (12) :1341-1345
[6]   Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: the new view on error and performance [J].
Dekker, SWA .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2002, 33 (03) :371-385
[7]   IMPLICIT VOICE THEORIES: TAKEN-FOR-GRANTED RULES OF SELF-CENSORSHIP AT WORK [J].
Detert, James R. ;
Edmondson, Amy C. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 54 (03) :461-488
[8]   Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups [J].
Dixon-Woods M. ;
Cavers D. ;
Agarwal S. ;
Annandale E. ;
Arthur A. ;
Harvey J. ;
Hsu R. ;
Katbamna S. ;
Olsen R. ;
Smith L. ;
Riley R. ;
Sutton A.J. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6 (1)
[9]   Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams [J].
Edmondson, AC .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2003, 40 (06) :1419-1452
[10]   Patterns of communication breakdowns resulting in injury to surgical patients [J].
Greenberg, Caprice C. ;
Regenbogen, Scott E. ;
Studdert, David M. ;
Lipsitz, Stuart R. ;
Rogers, Selwyn O. ;
Zinner, Michael J. ;
Gawande, Atul A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (04) :533-540