Comparisons of probabilistic linguistic term sets for multi-criteria decision making

被引:173
作者
Bai, Chengzu [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Ren [1 ,2 ]
Qian, Longxia [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Yaning [3 ]
机构
[1] PLA Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Meteorol & Oceanog, Res Ctr Ocean Environm Numer Simulat, Nanjing 211101, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast Meteorol Disaster, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] PLA Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Informat Syst, Res Ctr Software Engn, Nanjing 211101, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Probabilistic linguistic term sets; Multi-criteria decision making; Possibility degree formula; Fuzzy ranking; RANKING FUZZY NUMBERS; REPRESENTATION MODEL; PREFERENCE RELATIONS; INFORMATION; AGGREGATION; SELECTION; OPERATORS; DISTANCE; WORDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.knosys.2016.12.020
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The theory of probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs) is very useful in dealing with the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problems in which there is hesitancy in providing linguistic assessments; and PLTSs allow experts to express their preferences on one linguistic term over another. The existing approaches associated with PLTSs are limited or highly complex in real applications. Hence, the main purpose of this paper is to establish more appropriate comparison method and develop a more efficient way to handle with MCDM problems. We first put forward a diagram method to analyze the structures of PLTSs and develop the visualized way for readers to comprehend. Then a possibility degree formula is given for ranking PLTSs. Based on the new comparison method and the theory of the fuzzy preference relation, an efficient decision-making framework is proposed to solve real-life problems under linguistic environment. Conventional TOPSIS methods combined with PLTSs are also included for comparison. All results demonstrate the practicality of the new framework. Finally, we also seek out relationship between PLTSs and hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTSs), and compare the new formula with the similar approaches to HFLTSs' rating. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 291
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Ranking of fuzzy numbers by sign distance
    Abbasbandy, S.
    Asady, B.
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2006, 176 (16) : 2405 - 2416
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, SOFT COMPUT
  • [3] A New Ordered Weighted Averaging Operator to Obtain the Associated Weights Based on the Principle of Least Mean Square Errors
    Bai, Chengzu
    Zhang, Ren
    Song, Chenyang
    Wu, Yaning
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (03) : 213 - 226
  • [4] TOPSIS for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets
    Beg, Ismat
    Rashid, Tabasam
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (12) : 1162 - 1171
  • [5] A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators
    Bordogna, G
    Fedrizzi, M
    Pasi, G
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 1997, 27 (01): : 126 - 132
  • [6] A new method to rank fuzzy numbers using Dempster-Shafer theory with fuzzy targets
    Chai, Kok Chin
    Tay, Kai Meng
    Lim, Chee Peng
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 346 : 302 - 317
  • [7] A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management
    Chen, CT
    Lin, CT
    Huang, SF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2006, 102 (02) : 289 - 301
  • [8] RANKING FUZZY NUMBERS WITH MAXIMIZING SET AND MINIMIZING SET
    CHEN, SH
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (02) : 113 - 129
  • [9] Ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid point and original point
    Chu, TC
    Tsao, CT
    [J]. COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2002, 43 (1-2) : 111 - 117
  • [10] Degani R., 1988, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, V2, P143, DOI 10.1016/0888-613X(88)90105-3