Improving coherence of ecosystem service provision between scales

被引:9
|
作者
Everard, Mark [1 ]
Dick, Jan [2 ]
Kendall, Hazel [3 ]
Smith, Ron [2 ]
Slee, Bill [4 ]
Couldrick, Laurence [3 ]
Scott, Marian [5 ]
McDonald, Claire [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ W England, Fac Environm & Technol, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
[2] Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Penicuik EH26 0QB, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Westcountry Rivers Trust, Callington PL17 8PH, Cornwall, England
[4] James Hutton Inst, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland
[5] Univ Glasgow, Sch Math & Stat, Glasgow G12 8QW, Lanark, Scotland
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Scale; Regulation; Markets; Common law; Civil law; Societal levers;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
High-level consensus about safeguarding ecosystem services for optimal benefits to society is not yet matched by transposition to field scale. Various 'societal levers' - markets, statutory legislation, common/civil law, market based instruments and protocols - have evolved as a fragmented policy environment of incentives and constraints, influencing the freedoms of resource owners. This has produced mosaic landscapes reflecting both natural conditions and landowner aspirations. The Principles of the Ecosystem Approach serve as a framework to consider three case study sites: an English lowland estuary and two in Scotland. Societal levers today safeguard some socially valuable services, but the present policy environment is neither sufficient nor sufficiently integrated to achieve coherence between the choices of resource owners and wider societal aspirations for ecosystem service provision. The heterogeneity of societal levers protects freedom of choice, enables adaptive decision making related to the properties of the natural resource, and makes allowance for changes in societal preferences. Resultant mosaic landscapes provide flexibility and resilience in ecosystem service production. However, further evolution of societal levers is required to bring about greater coherence of ecosystem service production from local to nationalfintemational scales. This paper explores how issues of scale, regulation and variability manifest in the ecosystem service framework. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 74
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Strong and nonlinear effects of fragmentation on ecosystem service provision at multiple scales
    Mitchell, Matthew G. F.
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Gonzalez, Andrew
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 10 (09):
  • [2] Ecosystem service provision by road verges
    Phillips, Benjamin B.
    Bullock, James M.
    Osborne, Juliet L.
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2020, 57 (03) : 488 - 501
  • [3] Fruit tree ecosystem service provision and enhancement
    Baumgaertner, Johann
    Bieri, Markus
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 27 (02) : 118 - 123
  • [4] Synergies between biodiversity conservation and ecosystem service provision: Lessons on integrated ecosystem service valuation from a Himalayan protected area, Nepal
    Peh, Kelvin S. -H.
    Thapa, Ishana
    Basnyat, Menuka
    Balmford, Andrew
    Bhattarai, Gopal Prakash
    Bradbury, Richard B.
    Brown, Claire
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    Dhakal, Maheshwar
    Gurung, Hum
    Hughes, Francine M. R.
    Mulligan, Mark
    Pandeya, Bhopal
    Stattersfield, Alison J.
    Thomas, David H. L.
    Walpole, Matt
    Merriman, Jennifer C.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 22 : 359 - 369
  • [5] Improving the link between payments and the provision of ecosystem services in agri-environment schemes
    Reed, Mark S.
    Moxey, Andrew
    Prager, Katrin
    Hanley, Nick
    Skates, James
    Bonn, Aletta
    Evans, Chris D.
    Glenk, Klaus
    Thomson, Ken
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 9 : 44 - 53
  • [6] The Ecosystem Service Provision Index as a generic indicator of ecosystem service supply for monitoring conservation targets
    Jullian, C.
    Nahuelhual, L.
    Laterra, P.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 129
  • [7] Population Abundance and Ecosystem Service Provision: The Case of Birds
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    Cox, Daniel T. C.
    Canavelli, Sonia B.
    Garcia, Daniel
    Hughes, Baz
    Maas, Bea
    Martinez, Daniel
    Ogada, Darcy
    Inger, Richard
    BIOSCIENCE, 2018, 68 (04) : 264 - 272
  • [8] Networking Our Way to Better Ecosystem Service Provision
    Bohan, David A.
    Landuyt, Dries
    Ma, Athen
    Macfadyen, Sarina
    Martinet, Vincent
    Massol, Francois
    McInerny, Greg
    Montoya, Jose M.
    Mulder, Christian
    Pascual, Unai
    Pocock, Michael J. O.
    White, Piran
    Blanchemanche, Sandrine
    Bonkowski, Michael
    Bretagnolle, Vincent
    Bronmark, Christer
    Dicks, Lynn
    Dumbrell, Alex
    Eisenhauer, Nico
    Friberg, Nikolai
    Gessner, Mark O.
    Gill, Richard J.
    Gray, Clare
    Haughton, Alison
    Ibanez, Sebastien
    Jensen, John
    Jeppesen, Erik
    Jokela, Jukka
    Lacroix, Gerard
    Lannou, Christian
    Lavorel, Sandra
    Le Galliard, Jean-Francois
    Lescourret, Francoise
    Liu, Shanlin
    Loeuille, Nicolas
    McLaughlin, Orla
    Muggleton, Stephen
    Penuelas, Josep
    Petanidou, Theodora
    Petit, Sandrine
    Pomati, Francesco
    Raffaelli, Dave
    Rasmussen, Jes
    Raybould, Alan
    Reboud, Xavier
    Richard, Guy
    Scherber, Christoph
    Scheu, Stefan
    Sutherland, William J.
    Tamaddoni-Nezhad, Alireza
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2016, 31 (02) : 105 - 115
  • [9] Plant functional traits as measures of ecosystem service provision
    Miedema Brown, Liane
    Anand, Madhur
    ECOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (02):