Prediction of incident vertebral fracture using CT-based finite element analysis

被引:68
作者
Allaire, B. T. [1 ]
Lu, D. [2 ]
Johannesdottir, F. [1 ,3 ]
Kopperdahl, D. [4 ]
Keaveny, T. M. [5 ,6 ]
Jarraya, M. [7 ,8 ]
Guermazi, A. [8 ]
Bredella, M. A. [9 ]
Samelson, E. J. [10 ,11 ,12 ]
Kiel, D. P. [10 ,11 ,12 ]
Anderson, D. E. [1 ]
Demissie, S. [2 ]
Bouxsein, M. L. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Ctr Adv Orthopaed Studies, 330 Brookline Ave,RN 115, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Orthoped Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] ON Diagnost LLC, Berkeley, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Mech Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[6] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Bioengn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[7] Mercy Catholic Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Darby, PA USA
[8] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[9] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA USA
[10] Hebrew SeniorLife, Inst Aging Res, Boston, MA USA
[11] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[12] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Bone strength; Finite element analysis; Fracture prediction; Incident vertebral fracture; QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; TRABECULAR BONE; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; HIP FRACTURE; ELDERLY-MEN; STRENGTH; OSTEOPOROSIS; SPINE; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-018-4716-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A Summary Prior studies show vertebral strength from computed tomography-based finite element analysis may be associated with vertebral fracture risk. We found vertebral strength had a strong association with new vertebral fractures, suggesting that vertebral strength measures identify those at risk for vertebral fracture and may be a useful clinical tool. Introduction We aimed to determine the association between vertebral strength by quantitative computed tomography (CT)-based finite element analysis (FEA) and incident vertebral fracture (VF). In addition, we examined sensitivity and specificity of previously proposed diagnostic thresholds for fragile bone strength and low BMD in predicting VF. Methods In a case-control study, 26 incident VF cases (13 men, 13 women) and 62 age- and sex-matched controls aged 50 to 85years were selected from the Framingham multi-detector computed tomography cohort. Vertebral compressive strength, integral vBMD, trabecular vBMD, CT-based BMC, and CT-based aBMD were measured from CT scans of the lumbar spine. Results Lower vertebral strength at baseline was associated with an increased risk of new or worsening VF after adjusting for age, BMI, and prevalent VF status (odds ratio (OR)=5.2 per 1 SD decrease, 95% CI 1.3-19.8). Area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve comparisons revealed that vertebral strength better predicted incident VF than CT-based aBMD (AUC=0.804 vs. 0.715, p=0.05) but was not better than integral vBMD (AUC=0.815) or CT-based BMC (AUC=0.794). Additionally, proposed fragile bone strength thresholds trended toward better sensitivity for identifying VF than that of aBMD-classified osteoporosis (0.46 vs. 0.23, p=0.09). Conclusion This study shows an association between vertebral strength measures and incident vertebral fracture in men and women. Though limited by a small sample size, our findings also suggest that bone strength estimates by CT-based FEA provide equivalent or better ability to predict incident vertebral fracture compared to CT-based aBMD. Our study confirms that CT-based estimates of vertebral strength from FEA are useful for identifying patients who are at high risk for vertebral fracture.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 331
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Adams A, 2017, J BONE MINER RES S1, V32, P1
[2]   Cost-effectiveness of Virtual Bone Strength Testing in Osteoporosis Screening Programs for Postmenopausal Women in the United States [J].
Agten, Christoph A. ;
Ramme, Austin J. ;
Kang, Stella ;
Honig, Stephen ;
Chang, Gregory .
RADIOLOGY, 2017, 285 (02) :506-517
[3]   STATISTICS NOTES - DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS-1 - SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY .3. [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6943) :1552-1552
[4]   The associations between QCT-based vertebral bone measurements and prevalent vertebral fractures depend on the spinal locations of both bone measurement and fracture [J].
Anderson, D. E. ;
Demissie, S. ;
Allaire, B. T. ;
Bruno, A. G. ;
Kopperdahl, D. L. ;
Keaveny, T. M. ;
Kiel, D. P. ;
Bouxsein, M. L. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 25 (02) :559-566
[5]   Osteoporosis in Crisis: It's Time to Focus on Fracture [J].
Binkley, Neil ;
Blank, Robert D. ;
Leslie, William D. ;
Lewiecki, E. Michael ;
Eisman, John A. ;
Bilezikian, John P. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2017, 32 (07) :1391-1394
[6]   QCT Volumetric Bone Mineral Density and Vascular and Valvular Calcification: The Framingham Study [J].
Chan, Jimmy J. ;
Cupples, L. Adrienne ;
Kiel, Douglas P. ;
O'Donnell, Christopher J. ;
Hoffmann, Udo ;
Samelson, Elizabeth J. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2015, 30 (10) :1767-1774
[7]   Spine fracture prevalence in a nationally representative sample of US women and men aged ≥40 years: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2014 [J].
Cosman, F. ;
Krege, J. H. ;
Looker, A. C. ;
Schousboe, J. T. ;
Fan, B. ;
Isfahani, N. Sarafrazi ;
Shepherd, J. A. ;
Krohn, K. D. ;
Steiger, P. ;
Wilson, K. E. ;
Genant, H. K. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 28 (06) :1857-1866
[8]   Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography [J].
Crawford, RP ;
Cann, CE ;
Keaveny, TM .
BONE, 2003, 33 (04) :744-750
[9]  
DAWBER TR, 1951, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V41, P279
[10]   Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: The 2007 ISCD Official Positions [J].
Engelke, Klaus ;
Adams, Judith E. ;
Armbrecht, Gabriele ;
Augat, Peter ;
Bogado, Cesar E. ;
Bouxsein, Mary L. ;
Felsenberg, Dieter ;
Ito, Masako ;
Prevrhal, Sven ;
Hans, Didier B. ;
Lewiecki, E. Michael .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2008, 11 (01) :123-162